Do you think that the 9/11 attacks were a conspiracy, a terrorist plot, or something else?

Question

Best answer will be chosen based off best explanation, not necessarily the one I agree with.

You say liberal like its a put-down.

Answer 1

Govt. coverup all the way. So many holes in the story you can fly a 747 through them. If the government isn't hiding anything, then why are they hiding everything. Only 5 frames of what hit the Pentagon. The supposed BS of passengers taking back a plane, when reality and facts show that a normal plane crashing to the ground would have a damage radius of a mile, this had wreckage scattered up to 8miles. It was shot down. I do know that planes hit the WTC 1 & 2, but the buildings were designed to take multiple hits from fully loaded 707's(a plane very similar in dimensions, weights and fuel loads to a 767). NO steel building has ever collapsed from fire. They say that a fireball shot down the main shaft of the towers, but remember kids, heat rises. That and eyewitness accounts of explosions going off before the planes hit. The fact that 7 of the supposed hijackers are still alive and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian(british paper). The fact that molten steel was found below all 3 buildings(so you might think that was from the planes or something, even if so which it wasn't, building 7 was never hit by anything). I could go on, but you'd get bored of the info. I suggest you research the info presented to you, and figure it out for yourself. It's going to hurt, but that's what the truth does.
MORE FOOD FOR THOUGHT: GOOGLE: OPERATION NORTHWOODS. Our govt. has had a history of sponsoring terror attacks to put people into submission. COLD HARD FACTS

Answer 2

Actually, 9/11 is a conspiracy any way you look at it. The official story is in fact a conspiracy theory- 19 hijackers conspiring to hijack planes. However that conspiracy theory has no basis in fact and is provably false for many reasons. Take WTC 7 for example, this was a 47 story building which collapsed at free fall speed at 5:20 in the afternoon. IF ytou watch the video you can see a kink at the top of the building- clear sign of implosion as well as explosions running up the side of the building. In addition the owner larry silverstein, the owner admitted in a PBS documentary that they had "so much loss of life, maybe the best thing to do is pull it and they made that decsion to pull" Pull is a common demolition term. Then take the case of WTC 1 and 2 falling at free fall speed. If this collapse was a pankake style collapse how could one floor hit the floor below it and still remain falling at free fall speed. This violates Newtons law of conservation of momentum. The list goes on for miles:basement explosions, put options, no evidenvce of 757 hitting pentagon, Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's testimony, Fake bin laden video, and much much more.

Answer 3

JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES

http://www.wirednewyork.com/wtc/wtc_map.htm

Notice how building 6 stands between building 1 and building 7, notice how building 7 is in between the verizon building and the federal building.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_pan_si_01-clo.jpg

notice the distance between the buildings.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_wtc0915_1280-clo.jpg

notice the damage to building 6, the crater type hole in the middle of building 6. yet it is not completly collapsed. There is very little damage to either the verizon building or the federal building. but right in between those buildings building 7 is completed collapsed! and the building that was in between it and the world trade center tower building has not completly collapsed?

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_before_si_01-clo.jpg

Are you really going to believe that the damage done to building7 caused a complete collapse. and not a complete collapse to building 6?

If seeing is believing here are the best pictures to see for yourself please look at them. be honest with yourself. and answer the question how is that possible?
So the offical story is, if you can believe it - that the building directly beside the WTC tower DOES NOT completely collapse. but the building on the OTHER SIDE OF BUILDING 6 DOES COMPLETELY COLLAPSE?

What is the deal with this BBC report?
The BBC reporter is saying building 7 has collapsed with the building STILL STANDING RIGHT BEHIND HER!

God bless her she is british, so how could she know what building it actually is?

Please watch the whole video. http://www.documentaries.ws/1/news.php...

Even if you believe the offical story, then you believe it was a conspiracy. If you believe the offical story, you believe that 19 men CONSPIRED to fly comerical jets with military Precision into the WTC. and the little training they recevied was from known CIA sources.

Lets not forget that Osama is a known CIA asset. (Google Osama bin Laden FBI) you will find that he is not wanted by the FBI for 911. WHY? didnt our government blame him for the attacks?

Answer 4

The attack on 9/11 conspiracy designed by Neocons for the purposes of martial law in America, the political control of Iraqi oil and destabilizing Islam countries. As a windfall for war profiteers like Haliburton it has worked out great.

Answer 5

The zeitgeist, hogb and sixfeetall look to have it proper. No, a probability is thoroughly diverse than many human beings dropping lives in one of those astounding irritating way. This attack scarred the psyche of human beings throughout u.s., the united kingdom and alot of a few thing of the international. it really is a important distinction between a foiled attempt on some lives which without delay receives forgotten after the papers provide up speaking about it. also the money lost at the same time as the towers went down is one of those minuscule quantity compared to the money made by the individuals in touch interior the warfare with Iraq. I agree too many lives were lost, infact 1life is too many yet thats our opinion and it became obviously no longer the opinion of the individuals who prepared this awful journey. This became ordinary for them to tug off and that i do no longer agree that there have been too many possibilities for it to fail and too many possibilities to be discovered out. those are very very helpful adult men we are speaking about the following with wide quantities of money, factors, etc to apply. they have journey in those below cover operations and in effortless words contain the relied on twisted persons like themselves. If absolutely everyone exhibits out who shouldn't comprehend then they take them out, its no huge deal to them. they're so corrupt and so helpful and hence over positive that they don't look bothered that 0.5 the inhabitants thinks they did it. and really they're going to ask "What are you going to do about?"

Answer 6

Initially it looked like an Arab conspired terrorist plot, but on more careful observation and inquiry it looks like a conspiracy, by members of our own government, the NeoCons.

The fact that WTC building #7 came down in the same fashion as the other two buildings, without a plane hitting it, should raise eyebrows. The fact that this event, was not carried by the national media, should cause any good citizen to question what really happened. Further, no debris of flight 77 was found, at the Pentagon crash site, instead parts of another aircraft were found. If we can Identify those parts, we can determine if the official story holds water.

_____________________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is the one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 7

Of course terrorist plot. Before 9/11, WTC was attacked under Clinton Administration. If 9/11 was conspiracy, then first WTC attack was also conspiracy.

I think liberals only use that to attack Republican President- Bush.

Answer 8

The 9/11 attacks were initiated by Islamic radicals, including Osama bin Laden and members of his terrorist network, Al Qaeda, in order to destroy a significant American icon and many American lives. The attack was similar to the 1993 plan against the World Trade Center, also led by Islamic radicals.

Answer 9

The 9/11 attacks are exactly what they were reported to be, and liberal is a bad word.

Answer 10

For all intents and purposes, I believe it was an act of terrorism, simply by the way it was done. Terrorist Muslims believe that a passport to heaven is by sacrificing your own life in the process of taking many others, for the good of their country. It's done that way in Iraq and Afghanistan every day as witnessed by the suicide bombings. Of course they did have to conspire to do it, so it could also be called a conspiracy. But it was, in my opinion, a terroristic act. There is nothing to suggest otherwise.