Gannon in his 40s would be just as good as any QB the Raiders acquire. Not to mention this guy was one of, if not, the most accurate QB during the few years he was with the Raiders.
2007-03-01 13:19:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
he shouldnt unless he wants to hurt himself. as much as i would like to see him with moss, it prob wouldnt happen. be happy with aaron brooks....he's somewhat mobile
2007-03-01 13:32:31 · answer #1 · answered by krazy_alzan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the component is, the Raiders belong in Oakland. whilst the Raiders moved to L.A. the followers remained in Oakland, what you had in L.A. became a gaggle of human beings who grew to become prepared on the Raider image, not the Raiders. in my opinion, i like the place the Raiders play. i might desire to work out a sparkling stadium in Oakland, confident, yet i think of McAffee Coliseum is a extra useful abode for the Raiders than something in L.A. If the Raiders can win, which they are in a position to completely try this 2010 season then the seats will start up filling up returned. Oakland is in comparison to Jacksonville the place the followers do exactly not bypass to the video games for loss of hobby. Raider followers try to make a component whilst they don't bypass to video games and it style of feels they have. Many Raider followers are pondering or have already got offered season tickets now that the Raiders are turning around. And just to end, i also have a undertaking with what "Ice cube" mentioned on 30 for 30. The Raiders do not belong to l. a., they on no account have and that they on no account will. l. a. did not make the Raiders who they are, the Raiders made l. a. what that's, and meaning that l. a. belongs to the Raiders.
2016-10-17 01:41:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the Deal- As long as Al Davis is running that team, Raiders are going No Where.
Russel will be fun to watch though. Even if he spends most of the season on his back looking at clouds roll by.
2007-03-01 13:29:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rich Gannon retired because he got his bell rung too many times. The crappy offense for the Raiders was as much the system as lack of talent on the team. I don't care if you are Peyton Manning, with that offensive line you don't stand a chance. The Raiders suck and are the laughing stock of the NFL. It is pretty sad when nobody wants to play for you. Al Davis must die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
2007-03-01 13:29:25 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Hole In One 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wish. I am a huge raiders fan and i think it would benefit russell to sit one year, maybe not even a whole year to learn things. Garcia has been talked about, but who knows. I won't forget gannon leading the team to the super bowl. F***ing Gruden!
2007-03-01 13:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does Gannon really deserve to get the crap kicked out of him? That's like asking for torture. The line won't give him any protection, the running game is mediocre, and the team just stinks. Why bother?
2007-03-01 16:55:25 · answer #6 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rich gannon at the helm of the raider offense even after being retired wouldnt hurt it more than it already is.
the raiders are just HORRIBLE
2007-03-01 13:46:07 · answer #7 · answered by carlos l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IM SICK OF PEOPLE SAYING THAT THEY WANT FOR PLAYERS TO COME OUT OF RETIREMENT...THEY ARE OUT OF SHAPE!!!HELLO?WHY DO U THINK RICKY U KNOW WHO SUCKS NOW?
2007-03-05 09:35:52 · answer #8 · answered by offensive tackle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋