English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

No, being in the bush is much better than the hand!

2007-03-01 12:11:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

One in the bush is worth two in the hand.

2007-03-01 20:11:53 · answer #2 · answered by polk2525 4 · 0 0

Isn't it one in the hand is worth two in the bush. So it's not better, they're equivalent

2007-03-01 20:11:41 · answer #3 · answered by the_omniety 1 · 0 0

I'd like two hands in my bush any day baby.

2007-03-01 20:12:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I've only got one, but I like to keep it in the bush.

2007-03-01 20:12:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Takking Bees for example, no... I prefer them in the bush than in my hand!

2007-03-01 20:14:30 · answer #6 · answered by Nash 6 · 0 0

in the bush?


YOU CAN GET IT DONE WITH ONE HAND ANYWHERE!


the bush doesnt sound fun.

2007-03-01 20:11:56 · answer #7 · answered by SARAH D 4 · 0 0

That must be one HUGE "bush" if you can fit two hands in it!!!!!!

2007-03-01 20:12:50 · answer #8 · answered by twinmomm 3 · 0 0

for the 50th time it depends on the thickness of the bush

2007-03-01 20:15:52 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny Walker 5 · 0 0

unless you are talking about George Bush.... no at all times

2007-03-01 20:11:47 · answer #10 · answered by Lupita 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers