No, being in the bush is much better than the hand!
2007-03-01 12:11:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
One in the bush is worth two in the hand.
2007-03-01 20:11:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by polk2525 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't it one in the hand is worth two in the bush. So it's not better, they're equivalent
2007-03-01 20:11:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by the_omniety 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd like two hands in my bush any day baby.
2007-03-01 20:12:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've only got one, but I like to keep it in the bush.
2007-03-01 20:12:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Takking Bees for example, no... I prefer them in the bush than in my hand!
2007-03-01 20:14:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nash 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the bush?
YOU CAN GET IT DONE WITH ONE HAND ANYWHERE!
the bush doesnt sound fun.
2007-03-01 20:11:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by SARAH D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That must be one HUGE "bush" if you can fit two hands in it!!!!!!
2007-03-01 20:12:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by twinmomm 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
for the 50th time it depends on the thickness of the bush
2007-03-01 20:15:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Johnny Walker 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
unless you are talking about George Bush.... no at all times
2007-03-01 20:11:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lupita 5
·
0⤊
0⤋