English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

No. Those who contributed those dollars have every right to dictate how they would be used: Namely, getting their candidate elected. If they wanted to contribute to Katrina victims, they would have.

2007-03-01 12:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 1 0

Nope

2007-03-01 20:28:14 · answer #2 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 2 1

There are many ways the billions of dollars that the politicians use to "serve" us, could be better spent.

2007-03-01 20:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by Hot Momma 4 · 1 2

let me tell you, if they were spent in almost any other way it would be better for most people.

Katrina, global warming, educations, and health care; are just a few of the top arias.

2007-03-01 20:14:13 · answer #4 · answered by Thinker Paul 3 · 1 2

Yes or all the starving children right here in the USA!!!

2007-03-01 20:37:14 · answer #5 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 0 2

You need to understand trickle down economics my boy.

2007-03-01 20:13:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If anyone should pay it should be the local gov. of N.O. They failed the people of N.O. miserably.

2007-03-01 20:47:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes. End soft money!

2007-03-01 20:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by Gary W 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers