god could have stopped every crime ever commited with very little effort. doesn't he have a legall obligation to do so? i think the only reason he isnt in jail is that he is famous. we should have him arrested soon.
2007-03-01 11:52:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Wow..that's not deep at all.
2007-03-01 12:09:12 · answer #1 · answered by jimstock60 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they can't answer the question because of the fact there is not any earnings. "each and every thing has a unfavorable and we can all say, nicely that individual would not have this, yet we additionally will look on the positives," mentioned Rachel Hernandez. "i think of that regularly with immigrants we are forgetting their section." ok who's Rachel Hernandez besides some professional unlawful. perchance she is an unlawful herself? component is why do they print what she has to assert and why might all of us fairly care? Did she checklist any positives? No there are none to checklist. that's against Federal regulation to look into approximately immigration status because of the fact of Plyler v Doe. Plyler V Doe is an Un- Constitutional selection by potential of a liberal suited court docket that became in basic terms legislating from the bench.. No the place interior the shape does it say American Taxpayers are entitled to a loose preparation not to indicate an unlawful alien. If we are somewhat going to enact finished immigration reform, Plyler V Doe has have been given to be reversed. the reality that it is not even on the radar proves that our government is probably not involved in reform, purely amnesty. that's against Federal regulation to grant in state instructions to illegals yet California does it, in defiance of Federal regulation. If we can %. and choose the federal rules that we stick to then enable's choose for to not grant preparation to illegals and enable's tell the federal government whilst an unlawful applies for admission. enable's all turn in the direction of Washington and enlarge the midsection finger of the two palms. If Washington is going to %. and choose the guidelines that they'll implement, we could consistently be waiting to %. and choose the guidelines we would desire to stay with.
2016-10-17 01:34:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, you have achieved seriously dumb.
Just how are you planning on arresting God? Do you have a special set of handcuffs that would keep hold of His hands?
You wouldn't even have a chance with trying to deal with or arrest His pinky! And His most foolish thoughts are smarter and wiser than your most brilliant observations.
And His wisdom means that, far from being negligent, He actually has great (and *good*) purpose in everything He does.
How do you intend to arrest Him?
(And why haven't you been arrested for poor spelling yet? :)
Barjesse37
2007-03-01 14:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by barjesse37 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you attribute everything in the world to God, then I think you would have to let Him go on good behavior. Take the bad with the good.
2007-03-01 13:40:32 · answer #4 · answered by The Angry Stick Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God gave us the gift of FREE WILL...it is through our free will that we either serve him or reject him.
Without free will we are all just puppets.
Its the choices you make that will decide your fate (whatever religion or lack-there-of that you may believe in)
2007-03-01 13:58:16 · answer #5 · answered by auapc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you go and get the warrant and as soon as he can be located he can be arrested.
2007-03-01 12:02:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree!
2007-03-01 12:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-03-01 11:56:16 · answer #8 · answered by glamour04111 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋