shutter, shade, blind.
2007-03-01 16:04:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the window shade.
2007-03-01 12:05:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Arigato ne 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
here is Piaget's (properly ordinary psychologist) dialectic: he theory-approximately learning as being the interplay of subjects with products. once you communicate with reference to the international, you do no longer communicate with reference to the international. You communicate approximately your relationship in direction of that international (it rather is Piaget's dialectic). extra suited nonetheless, the belief is reflexive: as quickly as I communicate approximately you speaking with reference to the international, I communicate approximately my relationship in direction of you who communicate with reference to the international. If i intend to make it even crazier, i'm able to borrow an theory from Freitag. Language is a style of historic past following which each little thing is clever... in an extremely elementary experience, my concept is predicated upon my interpretation of the international (because of the fact my existence is symbolically mediated, my experience of the international is definite with the help of the barriers of the symbols i take advantage of to symbolize that comparable international to me). And that concept is often reflexively utilized because of the fact i could desire to apply symbols to describe the above. EDIT Is each little thing arguable. particular -- and mockingly, even this answer is.
2016-12-18 13:21:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by hogans 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
window shade
2007-03-01 13:45:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by concernedjean 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called a "shutter".
2007-03-01 11:44:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ms. S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read ur story, and I DON'T KNOW. I'm sure no one will notice exept that one guy
2007-03-01 11:44:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dai Dai 2
·
0⤊
0⤋