National Geographic has a great article that should be read by everyone! Especially Al Gore! Why is the media so down on any possiblility other than the one-sided environmentalist fanatics? Let's take care of the earth...but not freak out, o.k.?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
2007-03-01 11:29:26 · 6 answers · asked by SouthernGrits 5 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Because the mainstream media would be going against the liberal agenda if they even come close to broadcasting the truth .
Hillary Clinton is trying her best to silence other media outlets who are getting the truth out . The Internet and talk radio are on her hit list because Americans are becoming more informed . One by one - we are no longer buying the force-fed garbage from the biased liberal media , or the Democrats .
2007-03-01 11:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The National Geographic article discusses another variant on the theory that global warming is caused by a substantial increase in solar radiance during the last few years. The evidence cited is a change in the ice caps on Mars. The data about the Mars ice caps it too incomplete to draw any valid conclusions. Direct measurements of solar radiance measured on earth have been almost constant for the two decades or so for which good records exist. Unless the sun shines preferentially in the direction of Mars (and there is absolutely no evidence or theoretical justification for this), the theory in serious difficulty. Alternately, the changes on Mars can be explained entirely by the characteristics of Mars' orbit (warming is caused by being closer to the sun rather than by more sunlight). The evidence does not agree with the solar variability theory, so the solar variability theory is incorrect. The National Geographic article takes the same position adopted by Gore. I am amazed that journalists are sometimes educated enough to ignore theories that are not supported by the evidence, even when the incorrect theory makes an interesting story.
2007-03-01 18:20:57 · answer #2 · answered by d/dx+d/dy+d/dz 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The news media is busy covering more important events such as everything and anything it can muster regarding Anna Nicole Smith. She's more important than "Global Warming" and its spokesman and academy award winner Al Gore, don't you think? The news media does not want you be informed, what's wrong with you in asking such a silly question?
2007-03-01 11:35:17 · answer #3 · answered by cliff 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
isn't this site a media based column? you mayaswell say cloud seeding is all to blame, it's actually happening!
You are only seeing a little piece of this large puzzle
2007-03-01 11:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this article is is about just 1(one) persons opinion, we would still be looking for WMD if we believed only one person with a personal agenda..... could be a a propagandist paid by some political party
2007-03-01 12:27:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ya see, SUV's are so powerful they even affect Mars....LOL!!!
2007-03-01 11:46:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋