Does Iran have the right to nuclear energy and other technology ?

Question

I am not asking if they have the right to nuclear bombs or war heads or other weapons

Do they have the right to nuclear technology for energy ?

If so - under what conditions would you let them have it ?

Ben Dover

All men are created equal - except for you .

The hypocasy of the statement is befiting to yours

Heads up!

Maybe we should get Chretian out of where ever he is to form team Canada again and go on an international sales meeting - I think you and I should split the commision if they buy it - I asked the question and you gave the lead - Thats got to be worth 10%

Answer 1

They hanged a 16 year old girl who was raped for "crimes against chasity".

They should not even be allowed to play with matches or anything sharp.

Answer 2

Every country has the right to progress and with progression technology .Nuclear energy in my opinion is a fools game as the waste left from nuclear power stations in my opinion is more dangerous than an nuclear bomb as it has the potential to poison everything for a longer period right down to the water table and sea life .Green energy is the smart way as wind powered pumps that pump water into turbines is a much cleaner energy .I do not blame a country for the progression like Iran but it s intention on emotion that can end a life and end a country then the world .A level headed person will argue the point with fact to come to a conclusion and then know if it right to fight of talk but an emotional person will just fight and be ignorant .John Howard who made a level headed prediction that if soldiers leave Iraq the purpose of freedom for people will be lost and quality of life for the human being is no more?

Answer 3

The GCC and somewhat Saudi Arabia is the main needed united states of america-area interior the worldwide. I`m speaking concerning to the area that has what makes each and every thing interior the worldwide flow. presently, the united stateshas administration of that area. while Iran acquires its Nuclear technologies, then there'll be a considerable risk to the united statess administration. i don't think the risk to Israel excuse, as Israel is the main useful united states of america presently interior the middle East with undeclared Nuclear capacity. So it particularly is all approximately who controls the pass of oil, like the 1st gulf conflict while the united statessupported Saddam against Iran, then the 2nd gulf conflict while the united stateshad it particularly is long awaited excuse for a protection tension presence. Then the overthrow of Saddam to acquire Iraq. Or to sum up, for the united statesto proceed to be the better in that united states of america to any risk it faces.

Answer 4

If you could limit it to just electricity generation, then most everyone would be okay with it. But why evade the real issue? Why not ask whether Iran should be allowed to possess nuclear weapons?

If the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction was able to prevent war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, then why can't it work in the Middle East? Can't we tell Iran that if it attacks Israel, then we will launch a full scale nuclear attack against Iran? Iran is not a nation of fools.

Answer 5

Sure. And then let them know that there are numerous satellites in the atmosphere parked right over their air-space and that the moment, the nano-second, a silo is detected opening that American ICBM's in Israel would be activated immediately, and Tehran would be nuclear dust along with their silos where-ever they were detected. Iran is a whacked-out religious controlled nation that says stupid things like they're going to wipe Israel off the map. Those people shouldn't be allowed to own cigarette lighters. Besides, with all the oil they're sitting on, what possible use could they have for nuclear energy?

Answer 6

Of course they can thier under thier own soveriegnty but since its affecting the stability of countris around them and jeperdizing the US and many other countries. That is why everyone is so against it specially the US and nothing will change until they give in and change thier policy , also Europe is against this and they are not on our side on the war on terror so think about it, it really is a big problem internationally. They are dangerous not only because they have the ability and have those weapons but also because what they would do with them, we cannot trust them ad a very important factor we should have into consideration is tgier backround belief..so think about that. And no I would NOT let them have those weapons under any condition!

Answer 7

No. The leader of Iran, Amnedinajad or something like that wants to bring the apocalypes someway and wants to destroy Israel and all of it's people. Many of the Iranian peopel yell death to Israel, America, the UK and the pope after they go to church out in the streets. The Iranians are basically brainwashed from a young age because some give a speech publicly that they hate Irael, America ..... and they call israelites apes and rascist things. If we let them have nukes then they will probably bomb Israel and start WWIII then start a NUCLEAR WAR and then maybe the apocalypse.

Answer 8

They have the right to nuclear power, but not Nuclear weapons by the UN International treaty. It was the original reason the UN was created, to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction. This problem is over Iran's refusal to allow weapon's inspectors to visit their uranium purification plant, which is a clear violation of international law. If they would allow the IAEA inspectors to document what they say is true, there would be no issue in the UN. This is a country that strongly supports terrorism and refuses to comply with the legitimate UN inspectors, letting them make atom bombs would be a mistake we would all live to regret.

Answer 9

no one is saying they don't have the right to nuclear energy. what the problem is they want to produce their own fuel which leaves a weapons grade plutonium as a by product.

rights or not, the iranian president hates the west, and, with the regime being undermined by young open minded people and inflation ripping the economy apart, it is alomost guarrenteed that they would use the by-products for nuclear weapons use.

for those who thinks its right for them to have it because we do, go stay over there for awhile to see who you really would want to have influence and control in the world.

Answer 10

The trouble is, Iran is hip-deep in oil, so they have no use for nuclear energy. The act of adding 2 plus 2 is as easy as determining why Iran wants nuclear energy. Akhmadinnajad already said he wants to wipe out all the Jews, even if half his own country were wiped out in the process. What's so hard to understand?

Answer 11

Yes they have the right to provide nuclear energy to generate electricity.. If they used the CANDU nuclear reactor from Canada it would not be possible for them to make weapons grade plutonium with it`s by products..This might be a good option.