English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. (12) Carl Crawford OF
2. (13) Grady Sizemore OF
3. (36) Garrett Atkins 3B
4. (37) Jake Peavy SP
5. (60) Dan Uggla 2B
6. (61) Aaron Harang SP
7. (84) Prince Fielder 1B
8. (85) Jered Weaver SP
9. (108) Delmon Young OF
10. (109) Ramón Hernández C
11. (132) Nick Markakis OF
12. (133) Brad Hawpe OF
13. (156) Jason Isringhausen RP
14. (157) Chris Duncan 1B,OF
15. (180) Brad Penny SP
16. (181) Akinori Otsuka RP
17. (204) Jeremy Hermida OF
18. (205) Alex Gordon 3B
19. (228) Dave Bush SP
20. (229) Troy Tulowitzki SS
21. (252) Taylor Tankersley RP

1. (8) Álex Rodríguez 3B
2. (17) Grady Sizemore OF
3. (32) Hanley Ramírez SS
4. (41) Garrett Atkins 3B
5. (56) Brian Roberts 2B
6. (65) Aaron Harang SP
7. (80) Scott Kazmir SP
8. (89) Delmon Young OF
9. (104) Ramón Hernández C
10. (113) Bronson Arroyo SP
11. (128) Nick Markakis OF
12. (137) Takashi Saito RP
13. (152) Nomar Garciaparra 1B
14. (161) Brad Hawpe OF
15-21 on bottom

2007-03-01 10:42:44 · 10 answers · asked by repplaaayyyy 2 in Sports Fantasy Sports

15. (176) Brad Penny SP
16. (185) Akinori Otsuka RP
17. (200) Dave Bush SP
18. (209) Chris Duncan 1B,OF
19. (224) Salomón Torres RP
20. (233) Troy Tulowitzki SS
21. (248) Kelvim Escobar SP

2007-03-01 10:43:05 · update #1

10 answers

The first team is sub par. Looks like you went with a bunch of young guys. 2nd team is much better. Hitters on team 2 are way better. I think you value Harang too highly. He is a good pitcher and has good fantasy value, but he shouldn't go until the 7th or 8th round. I'd build up my offense before i picked pitchers. I think your second team could do some damage though, nice draft. By the way, it's good to see another sizemore fan, I have him on almost all of my teams.

2007-03-01 14:52:32 · answer #1 · answered by mac 3 · 0 0

In the first one I think you took Uggla and Harang?? too early. Plus your only closer is a banged up Isringhausen. SP really tails off after Peavy. Not enough HR. Not good.

In the second one, again Harang?? Again 1 closer. Don't see good ERA's or wins. Better than the first one but still not good enough.

2007-03-01 11:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by Bob Loblaw 7 · 0 0

1. Young potential that can and probably will do some damage in a few years. If this is a keeper league, you'll probably have some good trade bait.

2. Better picks but you need better pitchers and your guys to stay healthy. Cross your fingers and see what happens. This team mops the first one though

2007-03-01 17:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by dhtakemoto 3 · 0 0

i like team 2 alot more. team one has a lot of maybes but not enough surefire studs. dont overpay for middle tier sps, (harang, weaver) coming off career years. yuo can get comparable sp's later. i think you are too prospect happy. i know its a keeper league but un less you keep your entire team youth is overrated. dont worry about 2bs early, just draft kinsler late and get a guy like zambrano to anchor you staff instead. i do like the arod/grady/hanram start to draft 2 though.

2007-03-01 10:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by The Goat 2 · 0 0

Good Luck, aint nether one world beaters but you should be able to run mid-pack in your leagues The 1st team i give a 5 and the 2nd i give a 7

2007-03-01 10:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Visit www.FantasyQuestions.com.

Your Fantasy Sports Questions....Answered.

2007-03-05 10:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by FantasyQuestions.com 2 · 0 0

9 i assume. im particularly clever, yet while i elect to be. I particularly have a 145iq and that i like discovering, yet in terms of teachers, im established. not that i dont do properly, I particularly have a three.2, yet i dont learn and im completely content with a b. humorous because of the fact human beings think of im dumb, yet are stunned approximately how a lot stuff i understand and how clever i particularly am while they get of challenge to truly have an in intensity verbal replace. edit: i evaluate 7.5 established, not 5.

2016-12-18 03:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by suire 4 · 0 0

Team 2. I'd give it a 2

2007-03-01 12:48:28 · answer #8 · answered by Canes & Bruins 09-10 4 · 0 0

The first team I'd give a D+ with a 6.8 rating.

The second team I'd give a B with a 8.4 rating.

2007-03-01 12:43:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they are all good
I give a 8.7 on both

2007-03-01 12:46:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers