English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...I'm sure there's more than a few "#2" guys in the Iraqi insurgency, right??? there has to be....it's a good thing we have caught all of these "#2" guys, since it deflects from the fact that we have yet to catch the NUMBER ONE guy....

2007-03-01 09:36:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

I think this should be a wake up call to all. They've captured something like 11 #2's of Al-CIAeda. Are we finally waking up now? Hell the supposed mastermind behind the 7/7 bombings in London was a British Secret Service asset, and that's a FACT.

2007-03-01 09:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by Ted S 4 · 0 3

imagine a company, they dont usually have one vice president. they have multiple vices dependent on region or certain specialties. Not to mention everytime you get rid of one #2 they are probably going to promote someone else.
also, the Taliban and Al Qeada itself are two seperate things. the Taliban is a branch off of Al Qeada that controlled afghanistan from what i understand. You might hear a lot of times that someone we caught was the guy in charge of some other group that had links to Al Qeada which can then turn into the "#2 guy" in reports since Al Qeada's chain was above him.

2007-03-01 17:47:44 · answer #2 · answered by Vettepilot 5 · 0 0

every time the number 2guy is killed or caught number 3 gets a promotion. Did you think they just closed that position? If we catch all of the number 2s then number 1 has nobody to lead does he??? Maybe if all these "people" on here complaining about the war would get off their asses and enlist they would have caught him by now????

2007-03-01 19:45:13 · answer #3 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 0 0

I think they're all the #2 guy............. on the basis that Al Qeada + the Taliban are a bunch of sh*ts :-)

2007-03-01 17:48:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What happens to the #3 guy when they catch the #2 guy?

2007-03-01 17:40:24 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 3 0

That must be the #2 guy in the bathroom sense of the term.

#2 = Turd

2007-03-01 17:46:23 · answer #6 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers