http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/cthomas.htm
Former President Bill Clinton has thrived since His Presidency from speaking engagements before members of the Communist Party, Foreign Entities and Saudi Arabia.
Is anyone out there nieve enough to believe that those who are filling the Clinton Election Vault are not waiting to call in their chips if She is Elected?
Do you want a president under the influence of the Communist Party?
2007-03-01 09:34:49 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Everyone seems to be picking Hilary just because she's a woman or Clinton's wife. I will be in Juliani's camp. He's a GREAT leader.
2007-03-05 10:32:31 · answer #1 · answered by zelrio28 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So there still are some Americans who believe that the "communists are coming", not to mention that communism is not, and cannot be as bad as your crashing capitalism of today. Since I am not American, why would I care, but yes I do. It hurts to see that the president of a super power is 'elected' by people so unaware of the world.
2007-03-01 09:45:46 · answer #2 · answered by anlarm 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul or Barack Obama are the suited applicants. so as. IMO Pres. Obama vice chairman bill Richardson Sec. of protection Wes Clark Sec. of State Barbara Boxer? criminal professional well-known John Edwards EPA Al Gore
2016-12-18 03:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by suire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this the 1950's? Red fever is no longer an issue and he spoke for a real estate company in China, who were you expecting to run it?
If you care about the Chinese communists and Saudi Arabia maybe you should stop buying any form of oil or goods made in China.
2007-03-01 09:45:18 · answer #4 · answered by kass9191 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Don't be foolish enough to believe ANYTHING claimed by the Washington Times. They are wholly owned by Sun Myung Moon -- The "Moonies". Another has-been, washed up, discredited cult from the 80s.
2007-03-08 05:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would rather be under her reign then under the bushes law breaking reign.what about the chips that the iraquis call in when bush made it to office.evedently you dont have children over there dieing for no reason.i would rather believe in hillery then the killing machines we call the BUSHES.they are a bunch of money hungry people and they are earning it with the blood of our children on there conscience.i truly believe bush had something to do with 9-11to protect his and daddys oil money.if you would like to see more on this subject just get the dixie chicks documentary and you will finally know the truth,or better yet get ferenhite 911 on dvd.or heres you a web site to check out PRISON PLANT .COM that will certainly tell you the truth.and as far as the clintons are concerned,america was in a lot better shape when clinton was in office and will be a lot better with a new clinton in there,count on it.i wont to know now that saddam is dead,when are we going to try bush for crimes against humanity,hes no better then saddam was in my eyes.
2007-03-01 09:54:37 · answer #6 · answered by scooterpie 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ummmm, it's the Bushes who have the ties to Saudi Arabia.
2007-03-09 06:52:12 · answer #7 · answered by TaDa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because, unlike what the government fed you during the Cold War, communism is not evil. The more communist my leaders are, the better.
2007-03-05 09:42:33 · answer #8 · answered by Ranavain 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Communists and Socialists are split right now.
They will end up with Hillary, Edwards, or Obama.
They are all Samey, Samey.
And we are screwed.
2007-03-01 09:59:48 · answer #9 · answered by wolf 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Have they thrown their hat into Hillarys camp? The last election they chose John Kerry.
2007-03-01 09:40:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋