Is America hampered by only having a Two Party political system. .?

Question

Perhaps a Third Political force would ensure that the US stops seeing Everything in such Black & White terms.

Answer 1

Very much so. Back in the day(1776) there was no left wing/right wing parties barking at each other. Our founding fathers warned us of what a democracy would do in this Republic. Remember kids, democracy is mob rule, not what we were thought to believe. This great country was founded on being a Republic where what matters most is us, not the world. Not policing the world to the point of widescale control and power.

Answer 2

In the USA, both parties are dynamic in the sense that they change over time. The Democrats are not the party of FDR and the Republicans are not the party of Eisenhower. Instead they are defined by "the issue of the day".

Today the county is changing from R to D because of Iraq. This change is occurring despite either parties stand on other issues. The Iraq issue is all about: "How much resources do we want to put into solving the problems in Iraq?" I think the majority feels we have spent too much already, and actually solving anything will cost at least 2 times what we have already spent. Seven years ago, Iraq was not even an issue to most people.

Third parties do not spring from a group of non-voters. When they emerge, it usually results in a loss for the side that is closest to the view of the third party.

Answer 3

A no-party system would be better, but people will always want to divide themselves into factions anyway. A party system allows candidates to avoid talking about the issues, but instead the focus becomes the party, and pack instincts are a powerful compulsion to humans since we're social animals. If issues alone determined whether a candidate wins or loses, we might have a working democracy. Instead we have a civil cold war.

Answer 4

Of course. However, Americans are addicted to the 2-party system, so what are you going to do? There is reason to be hopeful, however. Bill Clinton won because of Ross Perot, a 3rd Party Candidate. George W. Bush won in 2000 because of Ralph Nader, a 3rd Party Candidate. They've had some influence on national politics in the past. Let's hope they have more influence in the future.

Answer 5

Third Parties do not work.
Check out history.
The only way 3 Partys could work would be to have 2 elections. First one, and then a run-off of the two highest vote-getters.

Answer 6

The US is hampered by having a one party system:

One party, two faces. Both pubs and dems are full of corrupt, money hungry politicians who want nothing more then to see a statue of themselves some day.

Answer 7

The two main ones now fight and don't get much done. Who wants to be part of such hate they have for one another. Worse than children.

Answer 8

That was my first thought...it works well here in Canada, but the truth is, people are two divided for it ever to make a difference. The roots just run too deep in history....the north and south you know. We all know how racists dig in their heels...hell you still haven't gotten rid of the KKK...talk about dark ages.

Answer 9

to maintain this trouble-loose, Southern plantation aristocrat's became into worthwhile becoming cotton and tobacco. by potential of inexpensive slave hard artwork made their earnings margin extra advantageous exporting their commodities to great Britain. This foreign places industry became into profitable for the Southern aristocrats. The British cleverly knowingly with this commerce, the aristocrat's could be keeping massive quantity of British wealth. The British devised a plan to absorb loads of this wealth sort leaving great Britain. They diminished their fees on British products, to undercut American production stable's. quickly American Southerner became into as a rule paying for British imported stable's. They have been given extra for his or her wealth paying for extra value-effective British products. This created a undertaking in u.s.. A northern marketplace became into dropping out on the Southern industry. so as that they took their grievances on the undertaking to Washington and demanded protectionism. Legislating protecting cost lists very much challenged British extra value-effective imports. This angered the Southern aristocrats at dropping their financial earnings, plenty so. Succession from the rustic became into their in basic terms path they could take. they could carve out-of the yankee territory, their very own u . s . a ., their very own government, their very own forex. To the Union this became into conflict! And conflict is what they gets! The South became into gearing up for power, for the conflict of independence. The northern union making plans their armed forces attitude got here up with a strategic plan, understanding affordable slave hard artwork became into the returned bone of the Southern financial gadget. they could do away with their slaves, loose the slaves and their financial gadget falls. and that's precisely what take place, the Southern states fail.

Answer 10

Republican party
Democrat party
Green party
Independent party


Those are the main ones.