Nobody who asks the conspiracy theory questions ever gives a reason as to how he would gain? Why would you do something on that massive a scale and not gain from it? From some of the questions I've read, nobody likes him, people equate him with Hitler and the dems in the congress want to impeach him. How would the man gain anything even if everything went well? Not only that, according to the lefties he's a moron to boot. And yet he managed to fool all those in congress to go along with his master plan. In the words of the Guinness guys, "Brilliant!"
2007-03-01 09:00:52 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He had nothing to gain. The fun thing for conspiracy nuts, is that it can never be disproved, so they'll continue this nonsense forever. The sad thing is this is being taught and discussed not just by Kooks on Kook websites, it's being seriously considered by educated professors. It's idiocy!
2007-03-01 09:10:01 · answer #1 · answered by Matt 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No one despises Bush more than me.
But this whole 9/11 conspiracy thing is foolishness by people who refuse to recognize the facts. They are great at asking endless questions about supposed inconsistencies, but when you ask them questions they start to get all huffy and hostile.
For instance, one of their main contentions is that Larry Silverstein muttered something about "pulling" Building 7, which is supposed to mean that it was deliberately imploded (see reference to article below by demolition industry professionals who actually worked at the site on the cleanup which totally refutes this). Why is this supposed to mean anything? If there really was this huge secret government plot to blow up the Twin Towers, why would anyone give a damn about Building 7? Wouldn't it be obvious that the Twin Towers attack would provoke enough outrage? Why would the (supposed plotters) feel it necessary to blow up a (by comparison) nondescript third building and why wait until 8 hours later to do it? But, as I said the conspiracy theorists, are crap at actually answering questions.
Finally, if I hear one more person babble that jet fuel fires can't melt steel...For the billionith time, steel doesn't have to MELT (e.g.liquefy) to weaken. If conventional fires couldn't weaken steel, there would be no need to ever fireproof steel. Yet every building code calls for structural steel to be fireproofed. Have you ever seen a tv program of a blacksmith shop? When the guy heats the metal to make a horseshoe, it is not molten (liquid), but it is extremely flexible and malleable with little structural strength.
I know that most of this doesn't pertain to your question, but I've been reading this conspiracy stuff for years and am sicking of hearing the same nonsense repeated ad infinitum.
P.S. Of course, this doesn't change the fact that Bush is the still the WORST President in the history of the United States.
2007-03-01 09:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you're basically getting your self right into a pissing contest. Time to permit bypass of the gangster mentality. the two events are working as a team to destroy the rustic. Whom ever comes after BHO, will proceed the ball rolling, basically like Bush persevered Clinton's stride. stop being a lemming, and attempt to have an unique thought. there is the place the undertaking is, no one thinks for themselves to any extent further.
2016-09-30 01:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To Nancy,
I want you to know that bush did it. If you read about the engineering of a steel-framed building you will learn that the temperature of oxygen started fire reaches temperature 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit and steel melts at 2,500 which is well over. Some explosives reach temperatures of 3,000 degrees which can easily melt steel. Also people found melted steel in the basement of the buildings. I want you to reflect on your PREVIOUS opinions.
Too-da-Loo
2016-02-28 08:59:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey Nancy, why don't you quit copying & pasting the same answers for every question? Can't remember what your beliefs are or your crap for credentials? Pathetic! Ooh, a Bush conspiracy question, copy, paste. Get a life.
2007-03-01 12:06:27 · answer #5 · answered by SillyKimmie 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All the free OIL he could aquire for the corporate elite and the Saudi Royal family.
2007-03-01 15:48:42 · answer #6 · answered by andy r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conspiracy theory was created to keep all of you stupid people occupied and keep you from using your idiotic perception out in public so the ones with a brain can vote ..They only want to impeach him to get even because we tried to impeached one of theirs first ..
2007-03-01 09:16:46 · answer #7 · answered by Insensitively Honest 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Deustche bank and Harken Energy
Please educate yourself.
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?t=1388
2007-03-01 09:15:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think Bush did it, he just isn't that smart. The Project for the New American Century and other eminences gris on the other hand... LIHOP at minimum. Look it up.
2007-03-01 09:06:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
people who believe this are feeble minded and have a hatred for the government most of us would not understand!
2007-03-01 09:07:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋