2007-03-01 08:28:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I'd choose to eat to live rather than live to eat. We all are too greedy and overfed while there are thousands of people out there who are dying from starvation.
If we all could eat to live then there would be enough food to spread out to those who have none.
2007-03-01 08:43:09 · answer #1 · answered by _ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Live to eat.
2007-03-01 08:33:42 · answer #2 · answered by biancajh 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
eat to live
if i was to live to eat i'd probably die sooner or later from obesity. Eating to live means that you eat enough to survive on, then you can have a good time after :)
2007-03-01 08:34:09 · answer #3 · answered by jason 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Eat to live, because there'd be less waste, more food for people that deserve it and I might lose some weight! I have a love/hate relationship with food and I'd love for it not to be so important!
2007-03-01 20:37:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what i would do is live to eat beacuse to eat to live sounds hard like living in the wild or something. but to live to eat is like to enjoy food from everywhere in the world for example.
2007-03-01 08:33:50 · answer #5 · answered by kia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd live to eat because i do love Cadbruy's! Hehe.
2007-03-01 08:32:29 · answer #6 · answered by Want Your Bad Romance 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do have the choice, I eat to live and my reason for doing so - simple - I am too young to die . !! xx
2007-03-01 12:35:50 · answer #7 · answered by Sierra One 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
eat eat eat im greedy
2007-03-01 08:35:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i would eat to live because i Berle eat as it is
2007-03-01 08:50:36 · answer #9 · answered by Drew P 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋