That's not true! I can think of at least one that's thin and ugly...
2007-03-01 07:39:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by @>-- Dee --<@ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you mean Prime Minister? Too bad you can't spell ("ans" for "and"?) and don't know the difference between "break" and "brake", and "their" and 'there"... but that's the English language for you. You had a fifty-fifty chance of being right, and guessed wrong each time.
Anyway, the reason they're all that way is that they are the only ones willing and wealthy enough to run for those jobs.
2007-03-01 08:55:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Edward M 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you're getting confused with John Prescott and Charles Clarke. Cyril Smith never made PM, and Kenneth Clarke and Nigel Lawson were only ever chancellors.
2007-03-01 11:55:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not all of them. Are you still in Winston Churchill era? Tony Blair isn't fat yet. Is he ugly or handsome? Depends on what your likes are. I would say he is more handsome than ugly but I really don't care. Their performance at the office is more important than good looks. Unfortunately they are there to do own bussiness...GabiPi.
2007-03-01 07:46:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gabriela P 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
well not all fat but definately ugly it must be a politics thing. That secretary hu had an affair with John Prescott must be blind, he is his wifes problem
2007-03-01 07:42:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shambolic 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
They go into politics as its the only way they can have affairs. If they had an ordinary job their secretary wouldnt look at them twice.
2007-03-01 07:39:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by norma d 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ah the cut and thrust of political debate and its very finest.
2007-03-01 08:04:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because they are so full of siht.......did i spell that right? :)
2007-03-01 07:36:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋