http://www.house.gov/paul/
2007-03-01 07:30:07 · 8 answers · asked by Michael E 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'll probably write him in, if he's not on the ballot. He's widely acknowledged as the only person in national politics who sticks to the Constitution. He's a medical doctor, not a lawyer. And to the people who would never vote for a republican, Dr. Paul is only a member of the party for procedural purposes. Independents don't get on any committees. He was once a presidential candidate for the libertarian party, and his politics haven't changed.
To those making Ru Paul jokes, try actually looking into Ron Paul. You might like him.
2007-03-01 07:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by Thisisnotmyrealname 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
HAIL TO THE CHIEF!
Ron Paul is an OUTSTANDING choice. A real defender of the Constitution.
Which is why he doesn't stand a snowball's chqance in hell of winning.
2007-03-01 07:33:56 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy B 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I'm voting for this twin brother, Paul Ron.
2007-03-01 07:37:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think it's pretty much impossible for a black man that dresses as a woman to win the general election.
Oh - that's Ru Paul. My bad.
2007-03-01 07:35:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i would be very wary of any more politicians coming out of Texas. Not a good track record for those types. The most recent was supposed to be a defender of the constitution, but he ended up not realizing thast defender and usurper have different meanings.
2007-03-01 07:40:12 · answer #5 · answered by Nick C 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think he's wasting his time constantly posting his name on Yahoo Answers to create "buzz."
2007-03-01 07:47:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Haven't we had our fill of Texans for awhile?
2007-03-01 07:46:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He is just another weak candidate.
2007-03-01 07:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋