European law dictates that Sony will be responsible for the reliability of its console for up to two years and in the rest of the world it tends to be one year. Sony felt this could be compromised by the hardware which handles backwards compatibility so it was hauled out to replaced with a cheaper and more reliable software alternative that doesn’t work nearly so well.
“PS3 is first and foremost a system that excels in playing games specifically designed to exploit the power and potential of the PS3 system,” said Reeves, no doubt sensing the outrage that would greet these comments. “Games designed for PS3 offer incredible graphics quality, stunning gameplay and massively improved audio and video fidelity that is simply not achievable with PS and PS2 games.” Then here it came: “Rather than concentrate on PS2 backwards compatibility, in the future, company resources will be increasingly focused on developing new games and entertainment features exclusively for PS3"
2007-03-01 07:13:12 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear
Just buy a PS2.....they're dirt cheap anyways.
Plus the X-Box 360 is a better alternative to the PS3. And a less expensive one.
2007-03-01 07:19:41 · answer #1 · answered by Barrett G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not keen on ps3. Its all media hype. I prefer wii its much more interactive and enjoyable to play. I have playstation 2 also that can play so many games titles.
2007-03-01 15:24:20 · answer #2 · answered by briggs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋