Rudy Guiliani is currently the republican front runner in polls.
2007-03-01 07:10:01 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The whole point of this question was that there was a demand that Clinton resign from office over this issue.
Now it seems the entire republican party has had a change of heart and now thinks cheating is wonderful or at least acceptable.
Thank you responders for proving my point.
2007-03-01 08:53:11 · update #1
At least he owned up to it. How many of Clinton's affairs did he deny? All of them sounds about right. "I did not have sex with that woman."
2007-03-01 07:15:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Not to mention he has been divorced at two or three times! He's a likable guy but come on, I'm a bit disappointed in the Republicans not having all of their ducks in row knowing that, thank God, that another Bush cannot be elected in 2008!
And as a sidenote, polls don't mean diddly squat. Right now it's too early. A lot can happen between now and when the primary season begins early next year.
2007-03-04 03:52:19 · answer #2 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I advise that the better decrease for contributions be performed away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement nevertheless proceed to be as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "provide away" software yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost savings plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of by potential of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so worried approximately it then why do not you; first positioned it returned into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their own interest, 2d pay returned each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet on no account paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the comparable for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they want something extra they do it on their own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had on no account been fairly replaced. They, a team of pupils, mentioned that each and every person expenditures of interest may well be 3% or much less for each individual to alter into rich if wanted (which could be genuine additionally to taces). the wonderful economic undertaking may well be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no expenditures of interest. Why not try this answer? the rich might nevertheless be rich. My question is: whilst soial risk-free practices will become a undertaking related to federal money owed, why not artwork with a balanced or earnings funds and spend no extra desirable than is available in, as any kin has to try for? Why not ban all loobying presents as a fashion to get rules that serve the country? God bless u.s..
2016-10-17 01:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's unfortunate but true that having affairs is becoming the norm among Democrates, Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives. How about you or your spouse? Where ae the liberals morals when they advocate abortion, children having sex, condoning pre-marital sex, teaching masterbation in school, filth in the media? Is there anything moral about the free thinking liberals? Does it make you feel better to point out one person's mistake. Look within your own party for morality before you criticize.
2007-03-02 13:01:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, I don't care what a potential president does in his personal life. No one is perfect. Live and let live. Also, I am a democrat. And if a republican were to win in 2008, Rudy is the only person I would want to see in the whitehouse. What he does privately isn't my business as long as it doesn't affect his ability to lead
2007-03-01 07:22:46 · answer #5 · answered by gizmo 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Clinton gets a bj in the Oval Office and Kennedy leaves a body in a river and you ask where Republican morals are.
2007-03-01 07:24:24 · answer #6 · answered by Keith 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Wow, what a concept eliminating candidates who have any moral indiscretions.
There would be no one left on either side to run.
If we can push this concept to the rest of the voters, I will run. Unless sarcasm is a moral offense.
2007-03-01 08:52:57 · answer #7 · answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How does the former mayor of New York's affairs represent all Republican's morals?
2007-03-01 07:31:22 · answer #8 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Most male politicians probably have affairs. They just havent gotten caught. In this day and age when priests are being revealed, this is very lightweight stuff. The moral fiber of this country keeps evolving in a direction that makes having affairs a very blazee thing.
2007-03-01 07:19:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Morals certainly don't follow political party lines, I think in general our entire country is suffering from bad moral standards.
2007-03-03 08:29:18 · answer #10 · answered by The Keeper 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Status quo in Washington...
America, Mark Twain once said, is a nation without a distinct criminal class "with the possible exception of Congress."
Eliah91? What does allowing gays to adopt kids have to do with morality?
2007-03-01 08:44:34 · answer #11 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋