Can anybody recommend from first hand experience a good machine that achieves above average results with below average running costs? It will probably not be used for producing photographic prints.
My last machine was a Canon MP360, and not being chipped, was able to produce perfectly acceptable results using very inexpensive unbranded ink.
2007-03-01 06:57:15 · 7 answers · asked by Novice 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Printers
Hi, I have the same printer as one of your other answers, its a hp psc750 and don't believe the rubbish about getting separates. The copier side is excellent, scan quality is very good and the printing is as good as our hp laser printer at work. Laser printers are good and quick but the cartridges are a ridiculous price depending on whether you using it for home or business use. I have even printed photos on mine which aren't too bad, although I have found the print quality on photos to be better using a decent standard paper instead of photo paper.
Have had this copier for about 2 to 3 years and it was a £100 from pc world. I would suggest any hp all in one as the cartridges are cheap from asda and they last for ages, and they are not chipped so you can re-fill them.
If I was going to buy another all in one now it would be a hp. Hope this helps
2007-03-01 09:09:20 · answer #1 · answered by martin m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can get a lemon in any brand at any time - especially with these all-in-ones. Just last week I dumped an AIO, not quite 1/1/2 years old, because of a faulty sensor. Had 3/4 ink. Didn't matter. Could not get past the 'paper jam' sensor light when there was no paper jam.
Don't pay too much then you won't feel so bad when one of the functions ruins the whole thing.
2007-03-01 07:51:12 · answer #2 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never seen a 3 in 1 which meet your criteria, and I have installed and setup many brands.
Far better for overall costs to get good quality separate components; For example, a Good Laser printer costs less over two years than an ink jet does... and so few seem to know that
2007-03-01 07:02:50 · answer #3 · answered by Mictlan_KISS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as nicely to the different posters: The previous testomony, The Septuagint [translated from Hebrew to Greek someplace 250 BC] grow to be in placed at that factor, used even till now Jesus' time. the hot testomony grow to be written 35-one hundred advert and translated to latin by St Jerome, now and back 4 hundred advert. it remains on parchments and examine interior the church, or preached orally. So, there's no NEW TESTAMENTS IN A e book/BIBLE type at that factor compiled with Septuagint.' Bible on my own' theory isn't in existence at that factor as there's no e book to call bible. It grow to be using Oral custom up till 1400 whilst the 'compiled e book type bible' ultimately hit the printing press. In different phrases, it took the Catholic Church approximately 4 hundred years of gathering, enhancing, and sorting the classic manuscripts and have been given revealed in 1400. there have been additionally quite a few uninspired writings [apocryphal books] that have been floating around that weren't cannonized.
2016-11-26 22:29:24 · answer #4 · answered by samas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a HP 750C. I love it, the cartridges last a good while and for a total of replacing both of them run around $45-$50 which isnt too bad. I use it for all my school work.
2007-03-01 07:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by fullerfyed 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I run Canon Pixma MP110...
Very cheap...
Very Reliable
Does the job..
2007-03-01 07:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
EPSON DX4850
THAT WHAT I HAVE.
2007-03-01 07:04:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋