2007-03-01 06:05:45 · 13 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If yes: isn't that using abortion as birth control because the "baby" is an inconvenience? I thought that was murder.
2007-03-01 06:13:25 · update #1
Again, I'm a Christian "conservative" and see absolutely NO excuse to have an abortion. I don't care if the lady is raped, slept with her brother, daddy, cousin, whatever. No excuse to intentionally take the life of the baby. Btw, the intentional taking of a life with malice is murder. Welfare or no welfare. God will provide for those who put their trust in Him.
2007-03-01 09:07:59 · answer #1 · answered by Evan S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any woman may have an abortion if she wishes..it is her decision and only hers.
If a woman is on welfare and becomes pregnant while receiving money from me and other taxpayers, her welfare benefits should cease immediately.
If she is well enough and healthy enough to roll around the bed with a sex partner, she is well and healthy enough to get a job and support herself.
2007-03-01 06:33:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt this question is anything but a red herring. Apparently you are unaware that one cannot receive welfare unless she has a child.
Our welfare encourages out of wedlock birth.
But to answer your question, I do not support abortion for anyone, and I do not look to ending welfare, for that reason. Reform welfare and require manditory sterilization for both men and women after two children born on welfare. But abortion no. It is eugenicide to suggest any such thing.
2007-03-01 06:17:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If they are on welfare, yes they should be allowed to have an abortion and then get their tubes tied.
2007-03-01 06:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If they pay for it themselves, yes.
We should not make an argument to support legal abortion by using this example. It is extremely callous and rude.
2007-03-01 06:10:01 · answer #5 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why don't you ask yourself demo sense it's you dems that are the ones murdering the unborn babies.
2007-03-01 07:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does that fit into the "Eugenics movement" of the GOP where poor people are encouraged not to procreate? We want winners only, Mister!
2007-03-01 06:09:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Let 'em breed and/or abort as many as they please--just make sure the bill comes to your mailbox, not mine.
2007-03-01 06:10:23 · answer #8 · answered by Trollbuster 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
They should be sterilized immediately after the birth so it doesn't happen again. And you know it would deary.
2007-03-01 06:15:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, they should have their legs sewn shut.
2007-03-01 06:13:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋