Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?
2007-03-01 05:53:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
the are afraid of the truth, or they just dont care.
it's funny how most answers are just insults ans dont provide anything to counter the claim.
2007-03-01 06:07:25 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The rate of free fall in a vacuum, at least, is easier to define. The towers were around 417 metres tall (excluding the spire), giving 417 = 0.5 gt^2, so with g = 9.8m/s^2 that gives a time of about 9.22 seconds. So if you dropped a ball off the roof, and there were no air resistance, then that’s the time it would take to reach the ground.
Now we have a basis for comparison. If the towers really did fall completely in 8.4 seconds, then that would actually be faster than gravity, requiring some major additional force to push from above (or pull from below). We’ve seen it suggested that explosives created a “powerful vacuum”, for instance, but that’s not apparent from the collapse videos and images.
Where people have quantified the collapse time they thought should have arisen, it’s not always helpful to the conspiracy case. D.P. Grimmer, for instance, believes the towers demonstrably fell in around 10 seconds, and has this to say about the time it should have taken in one scenario (if 30% of the gravitational energy of the collapse was lost in pulverising the concrete):
Now the observed time t = 10 seconds (a free fall time, the fastest possible time under g = 9.8 m/sec/sec = 32 ft/sec/sec = 32 ft/s exp2). For the cloud debris creation to absorb 30% of the gravitational energy, the observed time of fall would be 10s x 1.195, or almost 12 seconds. This long a collapse time was observed by no one.
Nearly 1.9 million pounds of explosives placed without noticing? Per tower? How many detonators do you think might be required for that? How much cabling? Is this sounding just a tiny bit unlikely to anyone?
There are more powerful explosives, of course: C4 will offer 34% more energy, for instance, reducing out requirements to 642,104 kilogrammes. Let's assume the conspirators used something ten times more powerful still: now we're down to 64,210 kg, or 141,558 pounds of this mystery explosive. Per tower. We're being generous here, but this still isn't sounding very plausible.
Yes, we hear you, maybe the conspirators used something even stronger. Small nuclear weapons, for instance. Trouble is, that doesn’t really match with what we’re told are demolition “squibs” visible during the WTC collapse
There is no proof of molten steel being found at the site.
2007-03-01 14:08:48 · answer #2 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
OK.... so if they're going to blow up the towers and hit the pentagon with a missile, why stage the elaborate plane hijackings? It would have been cheaper to carry out the mission, and less error-prone if they had just done that. And bombing the WTC isn't an unheard of concept, it happened in 1993 and failed.
2007-03-01 14:12:22 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you an engineer?
I am, and the periodic table has NOTHING to do with jet fuel melting iron.
You are only showing how ignorant you are.
2007-03-01 13:57:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Pick-up your tin foil hat, put it back on, and go back to your mothers basement. Just because your limited intellect leads you to believe in conspiracy theory doesn't make it so
2007-03-01 14:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because it's idiocy. It's one thing to be open minded and quite another to be empty minded.
2007-03-01 14:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
wow. It is nice to meet you...
i have never met anybody who was so brainwashed by terrorist internet propaganda.
2007-03-01 13:57:50 · answer #7 · answered by The Enlightened One 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because its a bunch of conspiracy theory crap!
2007-03-01 13:55:04 · answer #8 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Case closed indeed. Thanks !
2007-03-01 13:58:29 · answer #9 · answered by wizjp 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋