If both the Republican and Democrat candidates for president are no good, who's the next choice?

Question

Is there another realistic choice? Isn't this a bad thing that there really isn't?

Answer 1

there is no choice, the fabian socilist agenda has been pushed by the democrats and the republicans for the last 100 years.
clinton started NAFTA and bush jr. is pushing the SPP. if you don't know what SPP is google. while your at it google american union. ask yourself why no news coverage.

welcome to the new world order.

good luck and God bless

JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES

http://www.wirednewyork.com/wtc/wtc_map.htm

Notice how building 6 stands between building 1 and building 7, notice how building 7 is in between the verizon building and the federal building.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_pan_si_01-clo.jpg

notice the distance between the buildings.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_wtc0915_1280-clo.jpg

notice the damage to building 6, the crater type hole in the middle of building 6. yet it is not completly collapsed. There is very little damage to either the verizon building or the federal building. but right in between those buildings building 7 is completed collapsed! and the building that was in between it and the world trade center tower building has not completly collapsed?

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_before_si_01-clo.jpg

Are you really going to believe that the damage done to building7 caused a complete collapse. and not a complete collapse to building 6?

If seeing is believing here are the best pictures to see for yourself please look at them. be honest with yourself. and answer the question how is that possible?

Answer 2

I propose that the top decrease for contributions be completed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "provide away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost reductions plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of via the government. Do you agree or disagree and why? while you're so apprehensive approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it decrease back into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own activity, 2nd pay decrease back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet under no circumstances paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it a similar for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they prefer something extra they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had under no circumstances been fairly replaced. They, a team of scholars, stated that one and all costs of activity would be 3% or much less for each individual to become wealthy if needed (which would be authentic additionally to taces). the terrific financial situation would be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no costs of activity. Why no longer attempt this answer? the wealthy would nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial protection turns right into a situation linked to federal charges, why no longer paintings with a balanced or income funds and spend no extra advantageous than is presented in, as any relatives has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with the intention to get rules that serve the rustic? God bless u.s..

Answer 3

The Libertarian Party is the largest and most successful 3rd party in America, yet they are a far, far distant 3rd to the two major parties.

There are uncountable barriers to 3rd-party politics, from ballot access laws, to mainstream media bias, to various campaign finance reforms (that are supposed to lessen how Dems and Reps buy votes but also REALLY hurt minor parties).

Partly, it's the psychology of branding. After Coke & Pepsi, who is 3rd? Similar principles apply to the political arena.

Answer 4

The Libertarian Party is the next largest party. If you really don't like either party, vote Libertarian to voice your disapproval. Not voting shows apathy, voting third party shows disgust. I personally feel the Libertarian Party is the best, but you can make up your own mind.

Answer 5

A Bush dictatorship.

Answer 6

3rd party's candidate is at advantage!

Answer 7

the no good of the no good.

Answer 8

go independent