English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When explaining his opinion on stem cell research, Bush claimed he could not support a tax payer funded policy that "destroys life in order to save life."

But certainly Bush knew before he launched the war in Iraq that there would be innocent people killed in the cross-fire of battle. Certainly he knew that this military initiative (meant to protect us from WMD [to preserve or "save" lives]) would result in the end of thousands of innocent lives.

With that in mind (and because he is adamant in his belief that HUMAN life begins at conception) by his own standard is George W. Bush a murderer?

Sidenote: By Bush's standard a clump of cells in a petrie dish is worth more than an Iraqi civilian. Nice, eh?

2007-03-01 05:30:12 · 15 answers · asked by Timothy B 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Gotta chucke at AzzGood's answer: "First off the people of Iraq knew we were coming in, they chose to stay."

I Respond: You're right! They should have hopped into their BMWs and moved to their beach houses.

2007-03-01 05:47:24 · update #1

15 answers

Well Put!

2007-03-01 05:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Actually, I don't recall seeing him on tv or the internet putting a bullet into someones brain. He did not force anyone to join the military. As for the people in Iraq, I say kill them all! Men, women and children! They killed thousands of innocent people when they slammed the planes into the towers. So, to answer your question, George Bush is NOT a murderer. Everyone likes to place blame when times are tough instead of sticking together like REAL Americans should do.

2007-03-01 10:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by moneybagsgrl 2 · 0 0

First off the people of Iraq knew we were coming in, they chose to stay. Second the Iraqi people are the ones that are offing there own, not the US.

Also As of August 23, 2006, there were 21 non-U.S. military forces contributing armed forces to the Coalition in Iraq. These 21 countries were: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.

Don't just target the US...they are not the only ones.

2007-03-01 05:45:28 · answer #3 · answered by AzzGoodAzzItGetz 4 · 0 2

Yes he murdered 3000 people on 911. Explosives were planted in the WTC towers and Building 7 with the help of his brother Marvin Bush. Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! It was a scheme so Bush could use it as a pretext for military intervention in Iraq. America did the same thing with "Operation Northwoods" look it up on Wikipedia.

Bush lied about Saddams WMD. Also...The United Nations charter has a provision which was agreed to by the United States formulated by the United States in fact, after World War II. It says that from now on, no nation can use armed force without the permission of the U.N. Security Council. They can use force in connection with self-defense, but a country can't use force in anticipation of self-defense. Regarding Iraq, the last Security Council resolution essentially said, 'Look, send the weapons inspectors out to Iraq, have them come back and tell us what they've found -- then we'll figure out what we're going to do. The U.S. was impatient, and decided to invade Iraq -- which was all pre-arranged of course. So, the United States went to war, in violation of the charter. The war in Iraq is an illegal war initiated by President Bush.

So to answer your question....yes....Bush is a murderer, he is responsible for the blood, deaths and maiming of close to 800,000 people now.

2007-03-01 05:44:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

sure . there's a e book at your interior reach library called " A Case for homicide against George W. Bush ". it fairly is going to open your eyes . not a conspiracy theorist , the author convicted Charles Mason .

2016-10-17 00:47:30 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There is a difference between killing and murder. Killing every muslim in the world to preserve western culture is not murder but a good thing if it works

2007-03-01 05:52:47 · answer #6 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0 0

Because of him millions have been displaced and killed worldwide. (Afganistan, Iraq, hell even New Orleans!)
He spouts nonsense like "bring it on!" as if we were living in the wild west. Everyone else is evil... but not us. Yet, what he is doing to everyone can be considered evil.

2007-03-01 05:40:58 · answer #7 · answered by A R 3 · 1 3

Other than "spin", what's the difference between GWB and Castro, Stalin, or Hitler?

Nothing.

Well, Castro is better looking, Stalin was smarter, and Hitler had more fans.

2007-03-01 05:40:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

He's never been shy about executing Texans either.

2007-03-01 05:35:41 · answer #9 · answered by surroundedbyimbeciles 2 · 4 2

Some questions are so asinine they don't deserve answers.

2007-03-01 05:40:50 · answer #10 · answered by blank 3 · 3 2

Bush is not a murderer... he is a born again christian and that is much worse., he,he,he..

2007-03-01 05:38:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers