English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read that in an article that Chicago also designated Pro Bowl linebacker Lance Briggs as its franchise player. What does that mean?

2007-03-01 05:28:53 · 8 answers · asked by rejavanation 2 in Sports Football (American)

8 answers

There are two types of franchise tag designations: the exclusive rights franchise tag, and non-exclusive rights franchise tag:

An "exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount equal to or greater than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of a date in April of the "current" year in which the tag will apply, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams.
A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount equal to or greater than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position in the previous year, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. A non-exclusive franchise player may negotiate with other NFL teams, but if he signs an offer sheet from another team, the original team has a right to match the terms of that offer, or if it does not match the offer and thus loses the player, to receive two first-round draft picks as compensation.
It is the team's choice whether it uses an exclusive or a non-exclusive franchise tag. While it may seem that a team would always choose the exclusive option, there are two reasons a team might prefer the non-exclusive option instead. The first is that the salary is based on the top 5 salaries of the previous year instead of the current year, which could be a significant difference. The second reason is that a team may want the opportunity for the two first-round draft picks they would receive if they lost their player.

2007-03-01 05:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by d b 6 · 2 0

I know I've mastered the ability to walk, talk and read. There's nothing much left to learn in these fields, and I can do it all with complete ease. Doesn't mean I never stub my toe, slur a few words, or stumble on a sentence now and then, but I've reached a point where it's completely causal. I'm not an olympic sprinter, or a public speaker, or a speed reader -- those are all entirely separate skills -- but what I learned is plenty to get through life. I never forget that the martial arts are called an art, whether or not that's an Eastern interpretation, but in the West this does have a purpose. An art couldn't be something you perfect. Music, painting and sculpting all have near limitless potential, but stages of development that you would have to "master" to get better. A black belt, as we've explained before on here, is about having a firm understanding of the fundamentals, or "All basic movements and techniques, can be applied with extended force and proper application in basic combination." The key words here would be "all basic movements and techniques" and "extended force and proper application". I would say there is a mastery of having LEARNED the requirements and KNOW how to put them to use, just not anything further from the basics. I think people go a little too far with the word, using it mostly erroneously, but the intent of comfortably and casually using what you've learned is what they're all implying. As for the martial arts as a whole, that I believe is impossible, especially as an art.

2016-03-16 02:48:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What determines a franchise player?

A club can designate one franchise player (or one transition player) in any given year. The salary level offer by a player's club determines what type of franchise player he is.An "exclusive" franchise player -- not free to sign with another club -- is offered a minimum of the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of April 20, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, or the average of the top five salaries at his position as of the end of last season -- whichever of the three is greater. If the player is offered a minimum of the average of the top five salaries of last season at his position, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, he becomes a "non-exclusive" franchise player and can negotiate with other clubs. His old club can match a new club's offer, or receive two first-round draft choices if it decides not to match.

Can a club decide to withdraw its franchise or transition designations on a player? If so, can it then use them on other players?

A club can withdraw its franchise or transition designations and the player then automatically becomes an unrestricted free agent either immediately or when his contract expires. The club cannot name a new franchise or transition player that year. It can name a new franchise or transition player the next year.

2007-03-01 07:35:31 · answer #3 · answered by mdiggity 3 · 0 0

It means one of two things. first it means that he is the player that their franchise is built around and they have no intent of letting him go. the other is when a team puts the franchise tag on a player. which is when they pay him a certain amount of money for one year. this way they do not have to go through contract negotiations.

2007-03-01 07:02:18 · answer #4 · answered by nate dogg 2 · 0 0

IT used to mean the player was someone you could build your team around for the future . Now more often than not it's used as a name when a player is going to be a free agent his team will have the opportunity to sign him before anyone else at the league average salary for the top ten players at his position . S houldn't they come up with another name for this?

2007-03-01 05:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by boxpro86 2 · 0 1

When you put a franchize tag on them, that means that they are a franchise player. Which means if they ever leave the team, they would worth more and the team who signs them, has to give up round pick

2007-03-01 05:57:28 · answer #6 · answered by Chi Town Playa 4 · 0 1

I THINK it means that no other team can approach that player. In the case you mentioned the Bears and Brigg's agent will sit down together and work out the best deal for him.

2007-03-01 05:40:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

it means that a team is tight-fisted and is not willing to spend on a high quality player. that is indeed a shame.

2007-03-01 06:29:46 · answer #8 · answered by esnagui 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers