With Fox news in the lead, Anna's death has had longer press coverage and more attention than Saddam's - yet American troops died to capture Saddam and get him to trial. So which one is more important?
2007-03-01 05:09:58 · 9 answers · asked by Richard O 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clearly Anna is more important than Saddam, particularly to Bush and his right wing, "anything but real news", TV station. Anything that takes airtime away from Bush's incompetence and catastrophes is right up Fox's alley.
2007-03-01 06:22:23 · answer #1 · answered by golfer7 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was more important. Of course your blatant hypocrisy in trying to fault Fox for it's Anna Smith coverage while ignoring the liberal media's love affair with the story nullifies the importance of your question.
2007-03-01 05:23:59 · answer #2 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course Saddam Hussein was a threat to our country (U.S.A.)
Anna was a threat mainly to her self.
2007-03-01 18:17:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Anna Nicole Smith story is getting more ratings!!!!!!!!! It's all about the ratings!!!!!!!!!! You know conservatives love $$$$$$$
2007-03-01 05:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
More important? Neither. Biggest surprise: The one who DIDN'T piss off the greatest power the world has ever known.
2007-03-01 05:15:24 · answer #5 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam but really I don't care!
2007-03-01 05:28:19 · answer #6 · answered by bandangela 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could not care less. Don't watch the news. Causes media stress and depression.
Take care.
2007-03-01 05:17:05 · answer #7 · answered by X-Woman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the perspective, i guess.
2007-03-01 05:16:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. They're both dead.
2007-03-01 05:12:58 · answer #9 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋