Result of Bush's Political Payback to the Oil companies who contributed to his camgaigns???????
Or will they remain in a State of Denial like always?
2007-03-01 04:53:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They will remain in a state of denial and continue to believe the lies that are being forsed upon them on a daily basis. I am so sick of this administration! Hopefully this country has been duped enough so people will get out there and vote for a decent president to run this screwed up country.
2007-03-01 05:03:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Congress can not do some thing. The Repubic minority filibusters expenses combating them from ever being voted on. in the journey that they are voted on and exceeded, the President vetoes them. The Dems do no longer have sufficient of a majority to do some thing without the President and/or the Repubics. Bush and Cheney met with all the large oil cronies days after taking workplace and cooked up this oil scheme. it really is why they refused to grant Congress the files of the assembly at the same time as they were subpoenaed. Pelosi and Reid have both shown themselves to be incompetent. The Dems favor to unload them and get genuine leaders because they'd have an stronger majority after the subsequent election and they favor human beings in cost who can take cost. it really is the in effortless words way we may be able to get out of Iraq or make the different substitute. McCain will be elected and a clean Dem Congress can ward off him from doing any harm. You do comprehend that Bush and Cheney have their oil inventory in a so observed as blind trust (ha ha) and characteristic gotten wealthy at the same time as in workplace. Little Bush will not at all ought to ask the Saudis nor his daddy to bail him out of his failed employer ventures lower back. not at all. McCain 2008 Clinton 2012
2016-12-05 02:43:14 · answer #2 · answered by lesure 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gas prices are a result of supply and demand, not Bush and oil companies. The worlds oil prices are set by a world market, not Exxon Mobil. If leftists in the US would stop standing in the way of domestic production of oil there would be a larger supply world wide therefore lowering the price. Obviously the lack of economic education in our government schools is being felt among the general population, you question proves it.
2007-03-01 05:07:26 · answer #3 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
With only 30% of Americans approving his job performance I would say many Republicans have already found out what we always knew. Only the hard core stubborn, died in the wool, even if proven to commit a felony supporters still back Bush. I doubt they are convincable. Jan. 20, 2009 can't come soon enough.
2007-03-01 05:08:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You know there are some people in this world that you just can't educate and you are obviously one of them. Our high gas prices don't have anything to do with Bush or our oil companies. It's set by the world market of demand. With China coming on as a major industrial power and using more fuel the cost to the world rises. We get most of our oil from Canada, Mexico and even Africa, but you are to lazy to even research it before opening that thing you call a pie hole, I gall it something else!
2007-03-01 05:00:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
When will Liberals come to the realization that Iraq is not about oil. Because if it was, then why are our gas prices still so high?
2007-03-01 05:13:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
And Bush also caused Global Warming and he didn't stop 9/11 and is probably responsible for that pimple on your butt too.
Oh yeah. I forgot. I'm sure it was his fault the stock market took a dive.
And Al Gore invented the Internet.
2007-03-01 05:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by Faye H 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, they will stay the course.
2007-03-01 04:58:25 · answer #8 · answered by Mario Savio 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
???????????.................... Oh a lib. Now I get it!
2007-03-01 05:30:03 · answer #9 · answered by mark k 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋