English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just saw a report that the Packers have offered Aarron Rodgers for Randy Moss. Who do you think makes out better here? Would you be okay with letting Rodgers go?

http://www.footballsfuture.com/news/2007/02/aaron-rodgers-for-randy-moss.html

2007-03-01 04:47:51 · 14 answers · asked by Eric 3 in Sports Football (American)

14 answers

Ya ill take Randy over Aaron any day. aaron rodgers is defintily not the future in greenbay. and Moss would make the pack a playoff threat.

2007-03-01 06:45:32 · answer #1 · answered by Joel 2 · 1 0

Favre still has the talent and body to play the game at a level equal to just below any quarterback in the game. Quarterbacks are ONLY as good as the talent around them for the most part. Just look at Steve Young in tampa bay before going to san francisco or Troy Aikman in dallas before they surrounded him with pro bowl receivers, running backs, and lineman. Randy Moss if he can supress his ghetto rap culture mentality could be a great fit in greenbay. He can help stretch a defense which opens up not only other receivers but the run game as well. Letting Aaron rogers go would be ok with me. There are always good young arms coming into the league and rogers is expendable. He may blossom somewhere else but right now he is simply in the position of being money against the cap in Green Bay. With the weak NFC the packers are only a few moves or players away from being a legitimate threat to go to the super bowl. They should bring moss in but give him valium everyday!!! I just don't know how well a thug scumbucket ghetto boy like him will enjoy living or spending time in the more conservative green bay area!!! The packers will have to import some ghetto hoochie mammas and thugs for him to hang with!

2007-03-01 13:25:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Randy Moss for Aaron Rodgers?? First off if the Raiders actually seen something in RonRod, they wouldnt have traded up and spent the pick on Fabian Washington. Remember the Raiders selected 23rd and the Pack selected 24th! My point being, it is highly unlikely to trade that cancer stick "Moss" for a quarterback they didnt believe in, in the 1st place. So you PACK fans, betta hope you dont give up such a prized possession like RonRod for a "cheesehead mooning, waterbottle tossing, underachiever like Moss! If you do happen to get Moss, good luck! Just FYI, this is from a diehard Raider fan!!!

2007-03-01 15:26:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am a big Packer fan, and I heard this rumor this morning. Here is my take.................I actually think this a good trade. I think Moss has lost a step or two, but still is one of the better WRs in the league. It appears that his numbers have slipped since he has been in Oakland, but with nothing more than an average QB, the worst O-line in the league, no running game, and no supporting WR on the team, what do you expect. He never wanted to leave the Vikings, and wasn't ever happy there. Who ever said that Farve is old on the one answer is correct. He is not what he used to be, but he is still better than.......Aaron Brooks, Charlie Frye, Joey Harrington, Brad Johnson, Rex Grossman, Jon Kitna, David Carr, Eli Manning, Alex Smith, and many other that were the starters. Fancy me this.......Much improved defense, and on Offense.....Farve, Driver, Jennings, Moss, K.Robinson, Green, Marshawn Lynch, Morency, Franks, and an above average O-line. Think about it.

2007-03-01 18:58:59 · answer #4 · answered by Dustin S 1 · 0 0

I would hate it if the Pack gave up anything to get that over-rated slacker on their team, let alone Aaron Rogers. Last year, Moss blamed poor play on his mood. Give me a break. I hate guys that disrupt teams with their selfish attitudes.
By the way, who would be the Packer's quarterback when Brett retires.
And to the Cowboy fan here, I'd rather have Brett Favre than a guy who has butterfingers during the most crucial point in a game.

2007-03-01 13:23:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Maybe the Packers have a line on another QB. If not, I don't think I would be trading Rodgers. Wonder if that means the Raiders will not pick a QB first?

2007-03-01 12:56:12 · answer #6 · answered by Kenny 3 · 0 0

im not a pack fan but the pack would benefit. No one will do go with the raiders at this point and moss can still be good (even though he mooned the packers fan which is funny)

2007-03-01 14:18:43 · answer #7 · answered by sexy bass fisherman 4 · 1 0

Rogers is the face of the Packers in the later years Randy Moss says he hates to play in Winsconsin! Moss wants to stay in Cali or in Miami why would you play in GreenBay? Moss will stay in Black

2007-03-01 15:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

lol i see why this is a RUMOR and the packers havent offered anything yet.. why would they want arron rodgers when they are going to draft a QB who has the same experiance level... rodgers sucks... who ever started that rumor is an idiot

2007-03-01 14:46:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Packers suck, you got an old fogie as a QB and now u might get Randy "Crybaby" Moss look at his performance the last two years and tell me u still want the big wuss

GO BOYS!!!!!!

2007-03-01 12:52:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers