You're leaving too much info out of your presentation. I can see where you'd think there was a contradiction with these stories but I can't. Greenspan, I guess, could be considered an economic analyst now but I'm sure there are other economic analysts out there with a different analysis on the future of our economy.
And, as influential as it is, the construction industry doesn't represent the entire economy so just because they're currently sucking chub doesn't mean that the rest of our industry can't be on the upswing.
Your conclusion as a classic example of 'context dropping' You need look at more information and come to a conclusion based on this info instead of starting with a grim outlook and finding little bits of info taken out of context and bellyaching about it. Pull yer melon out of yer tuckus.
2007-03-01 04:43:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scheidemann 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The thing about yahoo news, is that they don't write any of the news themselves. If you look carefully, when you click on their news articles, they tell you who wrote them. Often it is an "Associated Press" writer or a "Reuters" article. The Associated Press and Reuters are two organizations that employ news reporters and writers to cover the various news events. The problem is that often times different reporters disagree on the same story. Because Yahoo is just selecting news reports that have already been written by third parties, and are trying, I hope, to give a good account of all the sides of the issues, they often publish articles that disagree with each other. If you believe that the news articles themselves are a lie, you should take that up with the services and writers who write them, not Yahoo. If you are just commenting that they are contradictory, I hope I have explained why.
Enjoy.
2007-03-01 10:38:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Random Knowledge 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The persons, I advise victims, on the embassy requested for back up and further protection. they have been denied. finally they were killed, by what some might want to call a terrorist attack. Others, equivalent to Obama and his administration declare that it replaced into once only a insurrection. i do no longer study about you, yet i have actual no longer obtrusive a insurrection with military grade grenade launchers and pc guns. Afterwards, Obama claims it replaced into when you think about that this 'rebellion" replaced into angered by using a racist video. no individual ever heard of this video until eventually Obama reported it, and it replaced right into a negative technique to positioned off a listening to. Now what's that this the type of large deal? properly contained in the shape you've taken any historic previous type, you would possibly want to keep in mind that an attack on united statesA. Soil is a press release/act of conflict. It occurs that US embassies are recognized US soil, regardless of the country they are in. So this attack replaced into authentic an attack on the U. S.. The listening to replaced into to be held to question the Obama administration on why we did not guard our electorate, yet Hillary Clinton were given the following down with a (without difficulty timed) blood clot, for this reason postponing her listening to. finally, Obama necessary to allow Clinton take the autumn. Clinton even reported "What does it situation?" in her protection.
2016-10-17 09:40:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last week, Yahoo printed a story from Ann Coulter, yet in the
poltical category, they are accused of being liberal.
I guess it's for us to make up our own minds.
From my point of view, the economy might soon be
sending out an SOS.
2007-03-01 06:16:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
All news outlets lie. They want attention and will do anything for it. They aren't held accountable for what they say. There are no punishments for them lying. Just watch Fox News sometime. They lie 50 times in 30 seconds 24 hours per day.
2007-03-01 04:40:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by KC Slim 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Media is always biased in one way of the other. It shouldnt be, but who can afford a free press? It costs money and whoever pays get their views highlighted. Sad but true, internationally.
2007-03-01 04:35:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The news media has always been a propaganda tool. For the US government.
2007-03-01 04:32:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by oldmanwitastick 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why don't you watch some other news?
2007-03-05 01:48:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by H.C.Will 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are the starting line up for the loony left wing liberals.
2007-03-01 04:26:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by TD1HOGY2K 1
·
3⤊
4⤋
they are disparate alright.
2007-03-01 13:28:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋