Tee, read the whole article. There are some flaws in the scientist's study such as not taking into account the wobble of planets and that greenhouse gases actually help bring our planets temperature up to a level to sustain life.
Also, from my vantage point, he used too little data to explain the weather on Mars. Three years versus over a hundred years of climate data here.
2007-03-01 03:35:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Go ahead, hide your head in the sand! I bet you still think that dumping PCBs and Dioxin into rivers is a good idea, also. I mean, you can't see it, right? So it must not pose a danger. Nice moniker by the way...is that how you spend your time?
2007-03-01 03:29:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sherri 2 Kewl 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes, according to one scientist's theory! This is clearly evidence that we should denounce all the other scientists who have conflicting theories, becasue this one, low and behold, supports a conservative agenda. Yippeee!
2007-03-01 03:40:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ive tried telling ppl this on here and i have gotten all kinds of thumbs down! Guess they want man to blame for it to
2007-03-01 03:32:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by rizinoutlaw 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Al Gores use of power was my guess. How many martians own Hummers?
HAHAHA, good point BTW
2007-03-01 03:33:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by virginity buster 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
oh ok you must be right then why worry about this planet, lets just make money
2007-03-01 03:51:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
You're wrong!!!! It's the little green men and their suv's!
2007-03-01 03:45:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Tree huggers are silly
2007-03-01 03:33:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by J S 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Oh nooooo!!!
Our polution is destroying Mars too???
How will we ever survive???
2007-03-01 03:30:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
2⤊
3⤋