English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think she is lucky in late 1990's when Steffi Graf was injuried and Monica Seles couldn't come back to her best after the attack.

2007-03-01 03:16:37 · 4 answers · asked by Andy Sun 1 in Sports Tennis

4 answers

Surface is the important factor here. If all were on their top form (Monica and Steffi circa 1992, Hingis circa 1997), Steffi would dominate them both except on clay. Steffi really had a hard time against Monica in those French Open finals and Monica would eat up Martina Hingis' 2nd serve. When she was playing, Monica had what was considered the best service return in women's tennis history and would probably beat Martina Hingis on any surface at their best. I kind of think that Martina would beat Steffi at the Australian Open, with the rebound ace court, though. Martina made 5 straight finals there and loves that surface. Steffi had some strange and unexpected losses there, as well. It would be very close on the clay, as well. When Steffi dominated Roland Garros, she never had to play anyone as strategically intlelligent as Hingis (at her very best, anyway) so Martina might have a small edge.

2007-03-01 05:00:28 · answer #1 · answered by kowtow21 3 · 0 0

Steffi Graf could have taken Martina Navratalova when she was in top physical form. As for Monica Seles, she could have beaten Hingis before that stabbing incident.

2007-03-01 03:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by trombass08 6 · 0 0

Hingis is pretty good- never cared too much for Monica and her annoying grunt- either way I think Steffi Graff could beat both of them!

2007-03-01 04:06:49 · answer #3 · answered by Butterfly 2 · 0 0

NO
Graff is Queen

2007-03-01 03:21:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers