Ageism, many elderly people are seen as no longer part of society, but as a drain on it, even though this elderly population have properly given more back to society that many of this generation have. And have life experiences to draw on that we can learn from. They have been Doctors and Philosophers. They are no longer seen as players in this world, they do have good days and bad days , there have drug and alcohol, mental health issues like all ages do . Yes they do even have sex, but the media portraits them as nothing but frail slow old body's who should move on and make room for the young, they are not actively seen on the TV and newspapers in positive roles, we are intolerant, self absorbed and materialistic and have little time for the elderly. What more can I say but...Logans Run!
2007-03-01 03:39:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Me 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I propose that the top decrease for contributions be completed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "provide away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost reductions plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of via the government. Do you agree or disagree and why? while you're so apprehensive approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it decrease back into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own activity, 2nd pay decrease back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet under no circumstances paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it a similar for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they prefer something extra they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had under no circumstances been fairly replaced. They, a team of scholars, stated that one and all costs of activity would be 3% or much less for each individual to become wealthy if needed (which would be authentic additionally to taces). the terrific financial situation would be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no costs of activity. Why no longer attempt this answer? the wealthy would nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial protection turns right into a situation linked to federal charges, why no longer paintings with a balanced or income funds and spend no extra advantageous than is presented in, as any relatives has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with the intention to get rules that serve the rustic? God bless u.s..
2016-12-14 08:10:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think being alone. Not getting visitors. Younger people have such incredibly hectic lives and don't take time to smell the roses so why would family take time to visit grandma once a week. Everyone always has an excuse, working late, kids have soccer practice, meetings, things like that. I think that is their fear, no one taking time to visit.
2007-03-01 03:05:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by mageta8 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some no longer drive, and have a problem getting places.
Some become homebound due to illness or injury.
Some miss their families--who have moved out-of-state.
Some miss their spouse--who died, or is in a nursing home.
Some miss their friends--same as above
Some actually want some privacy!!--but social service workers, etc. won't let them alone. (I know someone with this problem--she hates opening the door, as it might be one of 'them'--and there is nothing wrong with her--she just doesn't want to hear their crap).
2007-03-01 03:03:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Holiday Magic 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Social issues of neighborhood civility (e.g. noisy neighbors). When you are stuck at home without mobility, issues like this can make a difference.
2007-03-01 02:59:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rob 5
·
0⤊
1⤋