2007-03-01 02:01:38 · 12 answers · asked by sanjaya 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
both as a player and as a captain ponting is more aggressive than rahul.
rahul is not that animated on the field.
rahul believes on experience(sehwag's selection shows that) where as ponting is trying to blend youth into the team(putting faith on young watson and johnnson)
rahul is interfering in selectors job where as australian selectors don't let any body interfere
2007-03-01 06:21:18 · answer #1 · answered by dudelove 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As such australia doesn't require a effective captain (but Ricky is capable). India needs to have a captain, in case of his failure, the team collapses, Rahul makes it.
Ricky is aggressive player and Rahul is queit opposite
2007-03-04 21:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by tdrajagopal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure there's a distinction. I own between the wonderful upconverting Blu Ray gamers on the industry. My LG great Blu participant does an stunning interest upconverting popular DVD's. I surely have surely tricked some acquaintances into questioning they have been gazing hi def. Then I put in a Blu Ray or an HD DVD in basic terms whilst they theory the photograph could not get to any extent further useful. they are blown away as there's a super distinction. the better your exhibit screen is the bigger the version would be. A 1080p photograph on a greater 1080p exhibit screen is the wonderful of the wonderful and likely you are able to tell.
2016-10-17 00:30:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion Pointing is a better captain and a player than Dravid, but as a person Dravid has better personality than Pointing.
2007-03-01 03:19:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a captain Rahul can handle his team better than Ponting......
As a player Ponting can play better than Rahul..........
2007-03-01 02:30:09 · answer #5 · answered by jonathan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are good players and captains. Rahul is showing more maturity than Ricky.
2007-03-01 02:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
as a captain, rahul was a very encouraging man
than rickey!
as a player rahul sometimes failed to raise the
team in tough situations!
but, ricky was not!
2007-03-01 02:19:22 · answer #7 · answered by Arun 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
see difference their but rahul play the shots which ricky pointing cant play it and ricky pointing cant play the shoys which rahul can play so they are havng different minds according to their game
2007-03-04 16:52:16 · answer #8 · answered by mujahed 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no comparison of ricky and dravid.both r best but i think ricky made australia to win 2 world cups in his captainship and in dravid captainship india won as well as loose and in ricky's captainship australia loose only some matches.so i think ricky is better than dravid.
2007-03-04 23:14:44 · answer #9 · answered by monica g 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rahal is a really good captian as compared 2 Ricky
Ricky always makes a good winning total ,Dravid sometimes fails 2 score runs.but i believe he is Mr .depend ant
2007-03-01 03:17:35 · answer #10 · answered by stella d 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋