English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Even if you like Bush, shouldnt he go through the process and see what the evidence is against he and Cheney and the rest. Just as it was OK to do that to Clinton ( an actual ELECTED president ) for seven years.
If he is guilty of crimes do you really want to go down in history as the group of people that let him commit the crimes and get away with them. Whatever he is truly innocent of he will be exonerated from....he would have nothing to worry about. Or are Bush and Cheney and the gang "Above the Law".

2007-03-01 01:50:45 · 5 answers · asked by LC5150 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

Bush is nothing more than a Public Relations Screen, yes screen that of smoke screens on television. Dig deeper to find out where decisions are made.

2007-03-01 02:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by lightwayvez 2 · 0 2

Exactly what crimes are you talking about?

Please keep in mind that MOST of the western intelligence agencies agreed that Iraq had WMD's and the ones that didn't, namely Russia and Germany were heavily involved in the oil for food scandal. Also, Hussein HAD used WMD's in the past and was guilty of a well documented genocide... (why do people conveniently for get that?)

Congress, for the most part, whole heartedly jumped on the bandwagon (even though certain members have conveniently forgotten some of the statements of support they gave... Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Kerry...) But since congress approved, by definition, no laws were broken.

And no, I am not a Bush supporter, I'm just honest.

2007-03-01 10:06:39 · answer #2 · answered by David P 3 · 2 0

Nobody can be convicted based on your political opinions. We have a document called: 'The US Constitution' to prevent things like this from occurring.

BTW - before you can charge somebody with a crime you must do two things:
1) Be able to quote an existing 'on the books' law that forbids an action
2) Provide reasonable evidence that the person committed the act.

The Bush bashers seem to have forgotten about step 1.

2007-03-01 10:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

"an actual ELECTED president"- Get over yourself! Your pathetic whining is the same crap that has been pulsing through the liberal bowels for years. Come up with something original. Better yet, come up with some truth!

2007-03-01 10:09:02 · answer #4 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 1 0

What crimes has Bush committed?? With Clinton, there was no hiding what he did, and that why it was OK.

2007-03-01 09:57:01 · answer #5 · answered by J S 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers