2007-03-01 01:37:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
I would be p*ssed. Men and woman are wired differntly for a reason. They are built differntly for a reason to. Woman, although physically weaker, or more emtionally stronger and better at "multi-tasking" and can deal with the NOW.
Men, are phsyically stronger, more logical, but can't think day to day.
Now, if MEN were to have babies, I would give up alot of skills that I have attainted through childbirth, and child rearing. And the be honest, I don't want to be some brute (or some womens lib supporter)
It amazes me at hoe many women think men have it so much more easier. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. Its hard to be a man, because you have to sacrfice so much more than a woman. Sure, childbirth hurts for maybe, oh say 12-36 hours, but it goes away. And being a mother is a joy (for those who have kids, you understand) However, men have to be physically strong, have to be able to provide us women with food, have to keep shelter for us, make money and still find a way to tend to our emtional needs.
So, I would be really p*ssed if men were able to have kids, I like being emotional, feminie and a mother...
2007-03-01 04:23:35 · answer #1 · answered by Pandora 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Women should be given respect for the fact that so many of them have sacrificed so much for giving birth. Men, if they are the ones getting pregnant, respect will be given to them too as getting pregnant and giving birth is not an easy feat.
2007-03-01 02:28:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dads get to be just the labor coach and still have the babies that come out looking just like him. How cool is that? Who would want to give that up?
I don't think that many dads (or moms for that matter) would trade places. We certainly wouldn't
Despite all the trouble, how many women would not want to experience pregnancy and childbearing?
It works great for both moms and dads. I think we should keep doing it this way.
2007-03-02 01:02:21 · answer #3 · answered by Carl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be less people, (and SEX!) in the world, and we'd have a hard time carrying on the population.
They'd (men) create MORE birth control for US women, so we don't get them preggers! They'd also create more and more drugs to make sure their pregnancy and delievery are guranteed totally pain-free!
But, I'm glad they can't get pregnant. It's the one thing us women can do that THEY CAN NEVER DO!
2007-03-01 01:40:43 · answer #4 · answered by NAB 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'd think it would be great. But as a woman who is not going to have children and has never been pregnant, I don't have anything to worry about, either.
2007-03-01 03:33:51 · answer #5 · answered by transitangst 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Relieved?
2007-03-01 06:30:42 · answer #6 · answered by wendy g 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great. Let them suffer with morning sickness, being uncomfortable for many months in a row, agonizing pain and stretchmarks.
2007-03-01 10:42:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
bloody beauty,i (male),would be the almost biggest slut out,at $5000 dollars per kid,supp. parents allowance,allowing my body to be used as a baby machine,i would lay back and say comeone my impregenater,dooo it to meee.
2007-03-01 01:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'll be so much happy because they will realize how it is to be a women... on the other hand, i believe the real essence of being a woman is to be a mother,,, what will then be women are for if men carries the baby in their womb?
2007-03-01 01:44:51 · answer #9 · answered by anne raqsy 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You know, its a vain reason, but that would make sense with those METABOLISMS God blessed them with. Loosing baby weight would be a cinch.
2007-03-01 01:40:46 · answer #10 · answered by Sleek 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋