I AGREE, wholeheartedly, with your statement, that animal testing is a terrible thing, - but NOT with the rest of what you said! You BELITTLE this matter, - so FLIPPANTLY, - with a PUERILE attempt, at HUMOUR, - let me TELL you, though, - it ain't a LAUGHING MATTER!
It MAY sound, like I'm getting on my SOAPBOX, here, - and, I admit, that there's a POSSIBILITY, that I MAY have taken the question out of CONTEXT, - if SO, then, I APOLOGISE!
However, the FACTS remain! These animals, - DOGS, CATS, RABBITS, GUINEA PIGS, RATS, - or WHATEVER, - are UTTERLY DEFENCELESS! The poor creatures have done NO HARM, - yet, they are TORTURED to death! If they are being used, to help HUMAN BEINGS, then, I have a FAR BETTER solution, - which is, as FOLLOWS!
There are PLENTY of sick individuals, in the World's PRISONS, who should be subjected to this disgusting practice! If the eventual PRODUCT of such tests is FOR a human being, - then, SURELY, a so-called "HUMAN BEING", - such as a MURDERER, or a RAPIST, - would "HELP", much MORE than a RAT, or a GUINEA PIG! They ARE SUPPOSED to be "HUMAN", - aren't they?
At least, THEN, their MISERABLE EXISTENCES may, actually, have been worthwhile!
This Planet is a BEAUTIFUL PLACE, - SPOILT by the HUMAN RACE!
2007-03-01 10:48:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spike 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's awful. They should test on murderers like Ian Huntley, Ian Brady, Myra Hindley (yeah, I know she's dead), etc. xxx
2007-03-01 14:13:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joanne W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋