Would the world be a better place if humans did not exist?

Answer 1

Absolutely, no pollution, no hatred, no crime. Humans are responsible for all the terrible things that happen in this world... war, famine, disease.
I'd like to see how the world would be if there were no humans. I bet it would be beautiful.

Answer 2

Better place for what? If humans didn't existed then there would be another species who would be dominating this planet...it's all part of the evolution so who knows what that species may do to this world it's likely they would follow a path that we humans have followed and could be facing global warming right now but it would be totally different the way they would react and act about situations they would encounter.

Answer 3

I comprehend what you asking, yet from what attitude. the opportunities are infinite. jointly with pollutants would absolutely reason some unfavorable outcomes and be preventing different unfavorable outcomes on nature. Your asking people to respond to a question of what issues will be without us. we may be able to outline how issues are with us yet we can't outline some thing without us being area of it or viewing it. ok Seattle would not exist. No human sees it, how will all of us comprehend even if it really is "a perfect woodland, finished of flora and fauna and untainted air water and soil." Scientist let us know that is the way it will be, yet we can't comprehend. perhaps Seattle is below water, by using some different phenomenon interior the evolution of the earth. perhaps it really is coated in oil that seeped out of the earth because guy became no longer the following to pump the oil out of the earth. Lot's of issues were occurring earlier the emergence of guy. i in my opinion don't have wanted to be round in the course of the extinction of the dinosaurs. You state that guy has raised the extinction fee a lot larger. What would the extinction fee be in guy's year 2007 if guy became not at all the following. Is it conceivable that the extinction fee became absolutely worse because more suitable animals were getting better faster and killing foodstuff faster than it would get replaced? the hardest area of the study of technology is to save our own bias out of the equation. Many study start up by asuming the outcomes and then proving them. i'd be very shocked if any study were performed with the pretense that polution has had any positve result. the opportunities are infinite.

Answer 4

No. God made the world to run for humans. If we weren't in the world there would soon be to many animals an plants and it would be ruined just in a different way. When God feels our sinning has gotten to bad he will come back and fix the earth back to perfect again.

Answer 5

No, but here is a quote by Albert Einstein that I believe answers your question:

"The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of
the people who are evil, but because of the people who
don't do anything about it".

Answer 6

No meaningful world would exist if humans did not.

Answer 7

ofcourse, no pollution, still an ozone layer, no extinct animals, all the animals and plants would stay where they came from (not brought to other continents by ships for example) but it wouldn't be a better place for us!

Answer 8

Then there would not be a world. Unless you think the beast, and animals can do a better job.

Answer 9

This question has no answer. So far as we can tell we are no better or worse than other life forms on this planet.

Answer 10

Humans have done more harm than good.