Anybody know history.
2007-03-01 00:00:41 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
There were no terrorists until the term was derived from the word terror. Muslims are often confused with Arab, Persian, Turkish, African, and Asian people. The Mongol invasions of European, Mid-eastern, and Asian countries, and areas, were not Muslim wars, although most opinion of Eur peon and Americans says they were. The Muslim nations had wars with Westerners based on mutual military aggressions, mostly after invasions of the Middle-East during Crusades by Christian kings. More Christians were killed by Christians than by Muslims.
Muslims used offense as tactics to defend themselves. Please don't get baited and use the term when referring to acts of war. A retreating army uses terror to slow or stop a conquering army, but if we subscribe, terrorist to a legally formed military, such a Germans in WW11 retreat, and perhaps we should, then from a legal standpoint, all countries are genocidal and subject to sanction and punishment.
2007-03-01 00:34:34 · answer #1 · answered by peter s 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, start with Mohammad and work your way forward. The muslims have always been violent. They invaded N. Africa and then Spain. Then worked their way up further into Europe. The records speak for them selves. Just pick up a history book and read.
They were not called terrorists back then. They were called invaders.
As to the first guy that answered, while not all muslims are terrorists, pretty much all terrorists are muslims of one sect or another. Wake up to reality slick and quit drinking that koolade with the LSD in it.
2007-03-01 08:07:40 · answer #2 · answered by celticwarrior7758 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Okay - let's just say Sunni vs Shiite.
2007-03-01 08:53:36 · answer #3 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
terrorists are not the muslim neither the muslim can be terrorist so be care full next time when you are trying to link between the terrorist with the muslim
2007-03-01 08:05:56 · answer #4 · answered by luv2yas 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
what sort of question is this. how you can assume mulims as terrorists. what about the nazis and musolini. what about pinochet and stalin. what about the killing of the aborigines and the wipe outs of the blacks in africa. what about the torture of black americans.
2007-03-01 08:10:23 · answer #5 · answered by zimbos_05 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋