English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We know that:
US, IRAQ, THE ALLIED FORCES VS
MO’S INSURGENTS
(INSURGENTS FROM EGYPT, SAUDI ARABIA, IRAN ECT )

Because Mo told the insurgents they could have “the booty of the battlefield”

ISRAEL VS.PALESTINIANS 1948

Because of the Arab League for its moral hypocrisy - for being obsessed with Israel and expending its diplomatic energy in passing resolutions against Israel, while at the same time doing little to stop a genocide of the African nations..And because the Arab League introduces resolutions against Israel in the United Nations, that they aren't simply concerned with condemning Israel.

They are using Israel as a means to distract world media attention - particularly in Western Europe (and in Yahoo Answers when they call George Bush a Murderer)
- from the severe human rights abuses within Arab League member states. Such as Sudan , Darfur, Somalia ect
THESE HUMAN RIGHT ABUSES INCLUDE CHILD SEX SLAVES, CHILD SOILDERS AND OTHER HORRORS SO GREAT THAT ....

2007-02-28 23:54:05 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

THAT THE MUSLIMS THAT WERE IN POWER IN THESE NATIONS ARE GOING THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL COURTS FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY..
AFGHANISTAN: U.S., UK, AND COALITION FORCES
VS.
AL-QAEDA AND TALIBAN 2001

Because Bin Laden let the US and the Allied Forces chase his skinny legs around all of al- Qaeda and Taliban hidey spots when he realized the families of the terrorists of 9/11 had been killed and he had been ripped off.

The huge sums of money he had given to al- Qaeda and Taliban as payment to the families for their sons lives - plus the fact that Bin owned up to it - thinking he was going to be backed by a Holy War – exposed his betrayers by leading the US and Allied Forces to the first places of hell - Afghanistan - where Mo’s slaves were doing their religion proud.
SO ARE MUSLIMS INVOLVED IN THESE CURRENT WARS?.....

2007-02-28 23:57:32 · update #1

India vs. Kashmiri separatist groups/Pakistan 1948
India vs. Assam insurgents (various) 1979
Indonesia vs. Christians and Muslims in Molucca Islands 1977
Indonesia vs. Papua (Irian Jaya) separatists 1969
Nepal vs. Maoist rebels 1995
Philippines vs. Mindanaoan separatists
(MILF/ASG) 1971
Sri Lanka vs. Tamil Eelan2 1978
Africa
Algeria vs. Armed Islamic Group (GIA) 1991
Côte d'Ivoire vs. rebels 2002
Democratic Republic of Congo and allies vs. Rwanda, Uganda, and indigenous rebels 1997
Somalia vs. rival clans and Islamist groups 1991
Sudan vs. Darfur rebel groups 2003
Uganda vs. Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) 1986
Europe
Russia vs. Chechen separatists 1994
Latin America
Colombia vs. National Liberation Army (ELN) 1978
Colombia vs. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) 1978
Colombia vs. Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) 1990

of course they are.....
THE WEST ISNT THE INFIDEL
MO IS!

2007-02-28 23:58:57 · update #2

3 answers

.....you gotta feel a whole lot better now... ...getting all that off your chest...

in a way,..you've answered your own 'question',..[?]..

what other [if any] options / opinions /views /alternatives /considerations would you consider considering?....would you apreciate the rest of the world to consider considering?

i'm a bit overwelmed here...sorry.

2007-03-01 12:11:44 · answer #1 · answered by olddogwatchin 5 · 0 0

a truthful and Equitable international Justice gadget? and you think of that this "truthful and equitable gadget" might bypass after Bush for ultimately responding to the Islamic possibility - or do you think that a touch, in basic terms a touch, accountability ought to lie with the radicals who've indiscriminately slaughtered hundreds of harmless adult men, women persons and babies around the international in furthering their time table of murdering all who refuse to transform to Islam? Mmmmmm.....no longer undemanding catch 22 difficulty, eh? possibly your psychotic hatred for President Bush has blinded you as to who the undesirable adult men are in this conflict. the end results of ignoring those airborne dirt and dirt bags interior the previous has in basic terms led to basic terms in greater and deadlier terror assaults. possibly you experience we ought to consistently return to this coverage of state of being inactive - and want they simply bypass away?

2016-11-26 21:50:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

very well said, but they aint fooling anybody.

2007-03-01 13:38:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers