I mean, they ramed the boat, tried to rope the propellers, and assualted them with gas and chemicals!
2007-02-28 19:57:26 · 6 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I like whales.
I probably would have discouraged the crew and captain from going out to sea. You know, better opportunity's. More time with their families. I think they fish, because they can't do anything else.
So green peace does suck, because they don't have a real comprehensive policy. Nice conscience salving, head line grabbing.
2007-02-28 20:08:43 · answer #1 · answered by Wonka 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OMG the that guy creeps me out lol. For me it a sort of countries bare with me: Greece Alcohol is loose, Malta, Aberzanga or although you spell it, Finland, Iceland, The Netherlands and yet another one yet can no longer undergo in strategies which she became into representing even though it is going to be in my modern question.. i do no longer think of Germany could desire to win or get any factors as this is form of like Sweeden's track final twelve months..in case you be responsive to what I advise.
2016-10-02 03:47:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Was it ok for greenpeace to ram their boat? Was it ok for the whalers to be out murdering? Why do human interests come before animal lives?
2007-02-28 22:07:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It isn't ok for Greenpeace or anyone else to attack someone.
2007-02-28 20:13:15 · answer #4 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it wasn't okay. Terrorism in the name of so-called environmentalism is still terrorism.
2007-02-28 20:06:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yo ho yo ho a pirates life for me
2007-03-01 01:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋