I don't get, they get f*@>:/ in movies, for money, so what's the difference between a b**** and those actresses
2007-02-28 19:42:44 · 7 answers · asked by αƒяố~άs!αή 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
It's acting and many of these women have standins who play those parts. They're called body doubles.
2007-02-28 22:12:38 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Angelina Jolie & Sharon Stone play characters whose sexuality is an important component of psychological state. And they're hot.
2007-03-01 23:05:27 · answer #2 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sharon stone is an actress so she can portray it very well being a b_ _ _ _.
angelina jolie..she's a homewrecker and insane for adopting kids every now and then...i can't understand what she wants to prove to the world. i find it that she's doing it for free publicity not from heart ;>
2007-03-05 00:39:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sharon Stone may be a b i t c h but Angelina Jolie is a total homewrecker! also, i dont get the point of her getting kids...
2007-03-01 04:05:29 · answer #4 · answered by 53283663 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well if your's a serious question, i'd answer that they don't actually fu ck for real on the movies.... they act, they're actors..
Otherwise, they're all b°°ches
2007-03-01 03:55:02 · answer #5 · answered by Discoinferno 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't call Angelina a ***** I call her a home wrecker.
2007-03-01 03:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by mommy102905 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
both are
2007-03-01 04:57:37 · answer #7 · answered by David 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋