2007-02-28 18:33:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
You mean like he putted a golf ball? I don't believe he was legally married to Anna. Also, I don't think he's the father of the baby. Birkhead is willing to take a DNA test but Stern is dragging his feet so I don't think he believes he is the father. If all this is true then this "conspiracy theory" that he had something to do with the deaths of Anna and Daniel doesn't make any sense at all. If there should be anyone suspicious it would logically be the Marshall family. They have more of a reason to get rid of these people. If these deaths were in fact murders I hope they get to the bottom of this.
2007-02-28 21:05:10 · answer #1 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Anna Nicole doesn't have any money! Not unless some court awards her some of J. Howard Marshall's fortune. Fat chance that'll ever happen in Stern's lifetime.
If Stern actually killed Dannielynn tomorrow, he's stupider than he is greedy. The whole world's staring at him now and he'd have to pull an O.J. to stay outside of prison.
2007-03-01 04:13:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe Howard is guilty of murder. The autopsy proved that Anna Nicole died of pneumonia. Now the bashing of him killing her should stop. I can't believe people think he will kill Dannielynn. I do not judge anyone until All the facts are out in the open. God will be the judge. May Anna Nicole RIP SOON!!!!
2007-03-01 09:56:50 · answer #3 · answered by ® 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's kinda obvious that Stern has something to do with all these deaths...I wasn't there when the baby was made or anything but I seriously doubt that he is the father...and, yes, I do believe that the baby will be next...
2007-03-01 02:53:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yah, good question. Who does NOT see the connection here? He was there when her son bit it, now SHE'S dead.....he's just trying to kill them off for Anna's money. I say, he tries to prove he;s the father of the baby, and then he squirrels the baby away in some shitty bording house or something, and spends all the cash. Either that, or when he finds out the kid isn't his, he offs her too. I wouldn't trust that dude any farther than I could throw him.
2007-03-01 02:46:05 · answer #5 · answered by Penny P 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a little suspicious that Anna and her son died so close together. Does anyone else remember that Anna's stepson from her marriage to the tycoon died right after the court trial last year?
2007-03-01 02:44:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are wrong to assume that Stern is guilty.
My gutt tells me that he is not involved. And that he is deeply hurt at the loss. He would be richer had she lived.
I see his eyes and feel that he sincerely is grieving the loss.
2007-03-01 03:24:29 · answer #7 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋