Did everyone forget that, while at her law firm, she falsified documents to get money for her clients, and, of course, herself? Or, is her best feature that she is "not George W. Bush"? Is it not true that EVERYONE is also NOT George W. Bush?
2007-02-28 17:58:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This woman has already been bought and sold. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-02-28 18:57:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What charges were ever filed? This is still mostly America, and false unsubstantiated charges do not pass for truth. The relentless 24/7 investigation of the Clintons netted nothing, and neither will the current appeal of what has already been dismissed as a frivolous case.
Besides, republicans will not pursue campaign irregularities because their closet is bursting at the seams with them also.
But then, you are not interested in truth or reality, are you? Hannity is still circulating the lie that the Clintons stole things from the White House; something that is not just false, but something only an idiot would believe.
Don’t you think anything of value in the White House would be documented and photographed, if only for insurance purposes if nothing else? Don’t you think if someone walked off with even one of those items, it would be possible to come up with something (anything) showing that the item had, at one time, been in the White House, and now it is not there. Fools believe that stuff because they want to believe it and because they are too stupid to figure out anything for themselves.
The question should be – can you show that the Bush administration has told the truth about anything?
2007-03-01 02:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She falsified documents? Why wasn't she arrested and indicted? Or was this just another in the list of thousands of things she has simply spirited all the evidence away on? Yes, most definitely the sarcasm is intended. Her best feature is that she's the best person for this country right now. I'm going to do everything I can to help get her into the White House. I'm all for a return to respect from the rest of the world and a solution to this mess in Iraq, along with a full intent to truly tackle a War on Terror. Add that to her domestic policy beliefs and she's got my vote. A brilliant, tough lady talented in foreign affairs. Yeah, right, it's just because she's not Bush.
2007-03-01 02:18:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes it is true, she took that quarter from the plate but goodness she was only seven at the time. She put it back. All that other stuff is just mish-mosh. She is our only hope of pulling this country out the incredible hole we are sitting in. No she is not President George W, Bush
2007-03-01 02:35:29 · answer #4 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary hopes that time earases many memories we have of the Clintons
2007-03-01 05:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That was an allegation - not proven and dropped.
Have people forgotten that Bush is a liar and a warmonger?
Have people forgotten that Rudy has been married 3 times, had a mistress and a wife at the same time, moved his mistress into Gracie Mansion?
There are no lily white and clean politicians...they all come with baggage. Our job is to decide what baggage we can tolerate.
I prefer Senator Clinton for her leadership, her intelligence, her take-no-prisoner stance and her forthrightness.
2007-03-01 02:06:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Well the fact that she was acquitted seems to have failed your memory. Tell me in your America is everyone who is accused of a crime guilty regardless of the out come of the investigation, or is it just liberals?
2007-03-01 02:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. But the liberals only care about morality when it comes to destroying the lives of conservatives.
Frankly, I think it is high time for Conservatives to start saying, "PROVE IT."
2007-03-01 02:05:39 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
truth is, no one really cares right now (assuming a slight possibility that you are right). We are too concerned with a bigger fish (the President) that falsified documents and now over 3000 troops are dead. Over 20,000 with severe injuries and over 200,000 that have been to the V.A. for treatment.
2007-03-01 02:04:01 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
So? Better than desertion on any day. And alcoholism. And violence. And pathologilcal lying. And corruption. And... oh, there is a 2 TB limit.
2007-03-01 02:10:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋