Wait, it will get even worse pretty soon.
Now that the Administration stifled the Democrats restrictions on sending in troops ONLY if they were 100% prepared, Bush is going to send them in even if they're not.
Every American casualty from that point on becomes his to explain. The idiot isn't man enough to be Commander in Chief.
He is a disgrace, a divider, and a stubborn fool who will go down as the WORST president in American history.
And Cheney will go down as a draft dodger who sent American soldiers to die in foreign lands, when he was too much of a coward to do his duty. He isn't honorable enough to be considered an American.
2007-02-28 17:36:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Truth 5
·
6⤊
3⤋
They have proved their irrationality to all of us. Ideology is all fine and good, but when it creates sociopathic, irrational, and violent disciples, it is time to get some padded rooms readied. What is occurring today is a war between the rational and the irrational. The medieval mind is trying to subdue the advances that came with the age of reason. The reptilians brain is pulling out all the stops to reassert its dominance over the later-evolved neo-cortex. Some like Bush and Cheney have wholly succumb to it. They are reptiles in human skin now, totally unfeeling, totally cold blooded, totally irrational. The concern of insects is the level of their concern. The good news is that they have finally been caged by their prudent corporate puppet masters. The CEO's want the Clinton years back. A centrist, business friendly liberal PRESIDENT, they've decided is better for business than a divide and conquer, belligerent war-president, maniacal DICTATOR!
Walmart is seeing their sales go down because of the ideological vice-grip Bush and friends have put on the majority of the American people. These lower and middle class folks can't even buy the same amount of useless crap they used to. Look for either Giuliani or Hillary to win the next election
2007-02-28 17:51:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mak 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
This is a very DANGEROUS assumption. While I would agree that as time goes on, the Iraq war looks increasingly insane, I would be loathe to call Bush and Cheney stupid.
Bush may be inarticulate, incurious and detached, but that just makes him a more pliable puppet for Cheney and the rest of the neocons.
The people who I think are deserving of your contempt are the Democrats who, with VERY few exceptions, threw their support behind the Bush administration and continue to step carefully around the issue.
The war will continue unabated until the Democrats stop allowing the Republicans to define the parameters of debate and start taking major steps to end the war(s).
Of course none of this even matters until the US changes its foreign policy, which is unlikely. Both Democrats and Republicans have historically supported dictatorships, military strongmen, juntas, Islamic fundamentalists and right wing death squads whenever it serves the interests of the United States.
It is up to the people to demand change. Sadly, I have yet to see any of Hillary Clinton's supporters pressure her to change her position on Iraq. Instead, they look the other way while she supports the Bush administration's goals in Iraq (or offers, at best, tepid opposition).
2007-02-28 17:42:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, i do not imagine it really is making them look that way. there are one of those huge quantity of further aspects in touch with making Iraq helpful than in simple terms Bush and Cheney. they could't do each thing. Iraqi's ought to renounce their non secular wars adverse to each and each body. There can not be peace in that united states of america in the journey that they don't. and not at all to tutor all the terrorists, suicide bombers and such, are type of having interior the way of issues. Bush can not in simple terms tell them to renounce. it would not count number who the president is, an similar element would ensue to absolutely everyone in his position.
2016-12-05 02:21:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cheney swore his little misadventure in Iraq would be a "cake walk" and Bush pranced around in a little gay flyboy costume in front of a "Mission Accomplished" banner for the TV cameras before the real fighting even started.
They don't come any more stupid than that.
2007-02-28 17:41:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by chimpus_incompetus 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
No but you are coming across as fairly stupid. Stupider is not a word and anyone who creates multiple Yahoo ID's to spam the YA board with conspiracy theories has to be lacking in intelligence.
2007-03-01 00:32:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The problem with this kind of jackss is that they engourge their pockets and become more rich consolidating their power agenda over the world. Once they get out of office you me and the rest of the younger generation will have to deal with hatred against american culture and more terrorism to come. They had planted the seed of hatred and it will sprout stronger once they are gone. Washing their hands like Pilate. The other problem is that not you or me will be able to hold them accountable for all their profeteering and crimes to humannity. The saddest part is they dont really care what is the ultimate outcome of all this trouble.
2007-02-28 17:45:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by ION-CONSTITUTION 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Oh honey, they didn't need this war to look stupid....G-Dub looks like a chimp and Cheney shoots his friends in the face they're doing just fine on their own however the war is good insurnace that history won't remember them favorably...
2007-02-28 17:32:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Unfortunately my dear friend the real fact is they have almost reach their goal of half a Trillion dollars. That is the biggest swindle in the history of man. I wouldn't say stupid.
Should we storm the white house and have ourselves an old fashion Italian style meat-hook party. I would say yes.
2007-02-28 17:44:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Is there "stupider" in their case? I like to call them "the genital cabinet" - a Dick and a Bush - and just as intelligent, too!
2007-02-28 18:05:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋