English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The First amendment reads:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

That ensures a separation of Church and State. Thus, the government may not make laws about marriage if it is, as they insist, a "Sacred Institution."

2007-02-28 16:52:27 · 5 answers · asked by Das Schnabeltier 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I'm sorry, you people misunderstood me, I was not supporting that view that it is a "sacred institution," but rather that if it was, why can the government make laws about it, yet say its a "sacred Institution"?

2007-02-28 17:06:49 · update #1

5 answers

yes, you are right,,,,, it sucks, but people are judgmental, non-forgiving, and self-righteous it is funny that those same ones are christians,,,,,,who follow less of his teachings than the libs and non-christians,,,,,

2007-02-28 17:05:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is a difference between marriage as a religious rite and marriage as a legal contract. As a legal contract, the government has the right to define the terms, but they have to do so in a constitutional manner (which is why the Massachusetts Supreme Court directed the state legislature to fix the problem).

2007-02-28 17:08:58 · answer #2 · answered by HalJor 2 · 0 0

Marriage should be sacred between the couple & God should they choose. However, for most couples it is not a religious ceremony. A lot of people are married by Judges, or even boat captains even those who marry in a church have never attended it nor do they plan to attend church. This is not a religious area & the laws do not forbis marrying in a church.

2007-02-28 17:04:03 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

it consistently has been a sacred business enterprise. The intense fee of divorce has chiseled away on the thought, info are info. Now JFK's hijacked social gathering is popping it right into a battleground, the place they desire to incorporate homosexuals into that be conscious/meaning. the subsequent component you comprehend, it fairly is going to likely be mulit- individual communities which will or would possibly not incorporate the pals canine. JFK's hijacked social gathering will stop at no ends to handle any strange impulse that originate from the loins of the strange.

2016-10-17 00:04:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its a contract sorry genius it was not invented by religion. Its been around forever and is biologically based. legally its a contract. If you dont like contracts dont sign! But the government has every right to regulate contracts.

2007-02-28 16:57:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers