So they could use it as a pretext for military intervention in Iraq?
Why did Bush lie about Saddam's addiction to WMD?
How did WTC building 7 blow up into a fine pile of dust?
2007-02-28 16:46:33 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There are holes in the "official" 9/11 story that you could make a u-turn with a train in. Virtually nothing adds up starting with the small fact that none of the planes were intercepted in the most secure airspace in the world for two hours!? Remember Paine Stewart the golfer? His plane was intercepted in the mid-west in 2000 when it went off course/out of contact for fifteen minutes...the plane was trailed across the country until it crashed in South Dakota...but no fighters were sent to intercept a plane heading for the Pentagon?
There are dozens of more "inconsistencies".
AND why is it that a $20 bill issued in September of 1998 when folded a certain way clearly shows the Pentagon on fire on one side and an unmistakable image of the burning Twin Towers on the other side.
It works on any of the "new" US folding money when folded the same way...they tell the whole story of 9/11
The $5 shows the towers before. The $10 shows one tower burning. The $50 shows the towers falling. The $100 shows a trail of smoke rising from the ground.
http://www.foldmoney.com/
2007-02-28 17:05:58 · answer #1 · answered by Perry L 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, I do believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but I do not believe that Bush or even Cheney orchestrated the events. It was most likely accomplished by rogue elements across the CIA, NCS, and the Military Indusrial Complex. It is likely that both, or at least Cheney knew before hand (Mineta Testimony) and Bush has been the mythographer ever since. The reason Bush did not bother to go after the real criminals is because they are very powerful and they needed a "new Pearl Harbor" to accomlish their goals in the middle east. I wish it was just over Iraq, but I am afraid the implications reach much further into Iran, Venezuela, and others. BTW, nice to see ppl questioning 911 on answers.
2007-02-28 17:21:42 · answer #2 · answered by Luke F 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually it was Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz. Ashcroft, and every other member of PNAC. Bush has been nothing but a puppet of Cheney/ Rove since the he was appointed President Everyone should read these books: The New Pearl Harbor - David Ray Griffin, The 9/11 Conspiracy - James H. Fetzer, 9-11 - Noam Chomsky, and Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack - Eric B. Hufschmid, among others.
2007-02-28 17:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Then bypass tell to the families of those you died interior the crash interior the twin Towers that Bush mandatory a reason to grant troops in Afghanistan. Have seen a actual info ( with a actual crash and a actual progression ) that a progression hit by potential of potential of the shape of great plane won't bypass down so speedy ? Then it would propose that Bush and Bin laden are good acquaintances because of the reality the latter claims he organised it. And if so Bush supported him. you're particularly pathetic. And it took you 5 years to be sure that ? What did now not you ***** swifter on the television or newspapers ? probably you're in undemanding terms afraid to be rejected and look like a fool.
2016-10-17 00:04:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many times do I have to tell you people? Santa Claus and th Easter Bunny imploded the WTC so they could depose Bush and put the Tooth Fairy in the White House. It's a mass conspiracy involving Project for a Mythical Creature Century, with notable members like Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and Elvis' alien friends.
2007-02-28 17:18:32 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Pibb 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't care what anyone says, any President who spent 50% of his time on the golf range and allowed that disaster to happen deserves the sack, if not prison. There is something deeply suspicous about the whole affair and probably involves parties completely unknown to the western eye. It's the modern JFK of our time. We'll have whistleblowers, insiders, commercial conspiracists. But we don't know - we just don't know.
2007-02-28 16:56:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah they managed to plan this 4 years before they were even elected. Why did Russia lie about the WMD? Why did British intelligence lie about WMD's? Gee I don't know you fruitcake - maybe a 110 story building collapsed on itself. I seriously suggest upping your prozac intake
2007-02-28 17:30:56 · answer #7 · answered by dennis s 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Only a blind incompetent fool would think so! Clinton left that whole Bin Laden mess for Bush to walk into! Saddam had WMD's, he gassed the Kurds! Obviously liberals fail to remember this! Plus he had more than ample time to destroy or move his stockpile to Syria!
2007-02-28 16:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by Bunz 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No, I do not. Did FDR orchestrate Pearl Harbor as a pretext to go to war with Japan in 1941? It is the exact same type of situation.
2007-02-28 16:52:15 · answer #9 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
No but I do know that you are posting under multiple Yahoo IDs and answering your own questions You are quite amusing.
2007-03-01 00:37:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋