when he still cant figure out the election numbers from 2000?
2007-02-28 15:43:14 · 13 answers · asked by CaptainObvious 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
HA HA LOL...then again the weather man cant get it right two weeks from now,only about 20%,and anything under 100% aint fact
2007-02-28 15:57:06 · answer #1 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not even the United Nations Environmental Program can figure out what the Earth's temperature is going to be in the year 2050. It fluctuates like hell and 30 years from now my money says we'll be in for more global cooling.
If I were you, I wouldn't trust a guy that refers to people who dispute his global warming rhetoric as "deniers" -- the same insult used to smear those who don't believe the Holocaust happened.
2007-03-01 00:25:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We can figure the election numbers in 2000 where Gore won the popular vote! I think Florida is still trying to figure out the 2000 election vote!
Tell me, how do insurance company's compile actuarial tables, or the bean counters figure how much they will lose in law suits vs putting a defective product out?
Ever heard of scientists?
2007-02-28 23:55:20 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
By reading the theories between 1945 to the 1970's they certainly can not predict an outcome like they say they can.
There was to be another ice age. Now our globe is to increase in heat. All I can say is he made a lot of money and created a lot of fear in people just like the prediction of the coming ice age did. He doesn't know. The scientists do not know. They are hypothesizing again. One last statement, the first two weeks of February I could have used a little global warming where I live, it was a whopping 0 degrees with a windchill of 35 below.
2007-03-01 00:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by grandma 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's called a computer model. They predict macro trends in the climate. All have to be rigorously tested by the IPCC and fall within an error range. The reason we know they work is because they can be run backwards in time as well as forward, and they accurately show historical results from any time in the past up to today. In addition, many have been around for some time now, and the observations so far match the predictions.
2007-02-28 23:57:08 · answer #5 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Gore didn't lose in 2000, the nation did.
2007-03-01 00:00:27 · answer #6 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, the second part of that question is a childish insult, so I won't respond to it. As far as the weather predictions, scientists make those. I don't know exactly how, but I'd recommend finding out before you say it's impossible.
2007-02-28 23:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by anotherguy 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Oh, he knows the election numbers from 2000. Take a look at my source. If the US had a popular-vote system, he'd have won.
2007-02-28 23:51:14 · answer #8 · answered by Patrick 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He personally doesn't but there these people called scientists. Meterological scientists who study that sort of thing. They can plug histoical weather records into a computer and make an educated guess at to what the weather might be in the future.
That bunch on conservative hate radio love to nit pick and spew their clap trap so take them with a grain of salt. Common sense tells you how to believe not those guys.
Can we prove Voltaire wrong? He said that common sense is uncommon.
2007-02-28 23:55:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Gore is a spacial interest man. And the environmental lobbyist pay good. Look at who he worked for he learned how to lie from the best.
2007-02-28 23:50:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋