Why?
2007-02-28 15:30:07 · 8 answers · asked by St. Uriel 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Intellect without intuition must be based on the piddling amount that is known today. Intuition has no such limitations. Give me intuition anyday.
2007-02-28 15:35:27 · answer #1 · answered by Josh K 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am highly intuitive as well, and I do wish I could be a bit better at higher math, but my intuition serves me well; especially while playing Go.
2007-02-28 23:38:33 · answer #2 · answered by neuralzen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intuitive, or the ability to know without learning first. Yeah!
2007-03-01 00:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by Imogen Sue 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am extremely intuitive as it is, so I 'd rather be more intellectual.
2007-02-28 23:35:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be more intuitive, since it is the equivalent to common sense, and you just can't learn that, nor can it be taught.
2007-02-28 23:34:26 · answer #5 · answered by sustasue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
intuitive. I've known some VERY book-smart people who are absolute IDIOTS when it comes to real life.
2007-02-28 23:34:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Intuition. Inuition is never wrong. If you are wrong about something it is because you were using you intellect and reasoned incorrectly.
2007-02-28 23:51:25 · answer #7 · answered by stedyedy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest, I'd rather not have my character deliniated ala Myers-Briggs. Boxes impose limitations.
2007-03-01 03:10:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋