Zero...all would copy the first three....and leave, too.
2007-02-28 14:58:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
10. Just because 3 went away doesn't mean that they cease to be copycats. There were still 10 copycats, just in 2 separate groups.
However, insofar as this question goes, it seems thaere are plenty of copycats. The exact number... we'll have to wait until they stop duplicating other people's answers.
2007-02-28 15:01:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by feral_black_gryphon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
14
2007-02-28 22:32:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
10-3=7 COPYCATS.
2007-02-28 14:57:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the awnser is either 7 (which i don't think it is...) or it is 4 because if they were cpoycats then 3 times by two peple would be 6. then 10-6=4 so i think it might be 4.
2007-02-28 14:59:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
7
10-3=7
2007-02-28 14:56:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by llllarry1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zero. They were all copycats.
2007-02-28 14:57:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
clearly, 7
2007-02-28 14:57:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
10, dispersed.
2007-02-28 14:58:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael da Man 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
zero, they copied each other and all went away
2007-02-28 15:44:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋