http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/280207BBC.htm
The BBC says it has lost all of its tapes from 9/11. They also reported that WTC 7 had collapsed (2 separate times) when the builiding is still standing from a live interview. The only way they could have repoted this is if they were told that the building was going to be pulled since no steel framed skyskraper had ever collapsed because of fire. Note- building 7 was never hit by a plane, this was the third skyscraper to collapse. Read the article and tell me what you think, this cannot be passed off as a coincidence
2007-02-28 14:23:32 · 17 answers · asked by Luke F 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I love how all you you people call me nuts without even reading the article. By the way not one of you have a reason why this could have happened, so it is quite obvious you are the ones that are nuts. I just follow the evidence. It is a real shame you people will not even be open into looking at the most important event in recent history, a real shame.
2007-02-28 14:37:36 · update #1
jeeper- plenty of answers to all of your questions, you just need to do the research. And yes ppl have come out and said levels of the WTC were shut down in the weeks leading up to 9/11
2007-02-28 16:02:26 · update #2
It is sad that someday, those who do not believe now, will pay the same price as the rest of us and perhaps wish they had listened.
I do not know how Alex Jones and his evidence, backed up well by film, interviews, photographs and inside tracks can be ignored by so many.
These people do not realize that conspiracy people are trying to do good and open the eyes of those blinded to reality! Those who choose to believe the words of deceivers and profiteers of death do not realize what they are doing.
They are unable to see that we are at the point of no return. The state run media has done its job all too well. How can one ignore the pancake fall of these buildings?
I suppose in many cases they are resigned that this is the end that God has promised and that Jesus will save them. Boggles the mind it does! They do not realize this attitude is as distorted as is that of a young Muslim who has been taught that America is the great satan.
Military spending in Oreo talk:
http://www.truemajority.org/fun/
Oh by the way, Bush, the Great Leader, has an IQ of 91. The lowest of a pres to date. His daddy was only 98. Madonna and Shakira have IQs of 140!
http://aceviper.net/estimated_iq_of_famous_people.php
All we can do is pray we all survive.
Luke, enjoy the links.
2007-02-28 14:49:23 · answer #1 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There are definitely unanswered questions for sure. In the previous Trade Center attack a truck bomb was used to attempt to blow structural support. There are many reports of other explosions. There is a possibility that al-Qaeda would try to perfect this method, the hijacked planes may have been more of a diversion. It is unlikely that the fires from those planes brought down all three buildings. Terrorists attacked on 9/11. Osama bin Laden was not the mastermind of the attack but he did aid in the assault. Some of the truth has been told, but not the entire truth.
Was Bush involved? No. Has he responded appropriately? In the beginning, yes. Did he follow through? NO. He attacked al-Qaeda's enemy - Iraq. He wishes he could attack another al-Qaeda enemy, Iran. He kisses up to the source of al-Qaeda - Saudi Arabia. So, one act of evil was used as a blatantly fraudulent excuse to commit another act of evil. Now it is a clusterf***. Dishonor and disgrace. The George W. Bush legacy of failure.
2007-02-28 22:40:05 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea, sure we believe some super secret group used Romulan Cloaking Technology to hide its members as they planted thousands of demo charges in WTC 1,2 and 7 in the months leading up to 9/11.
Were sure every tenet in WTC 1,2 and 7 were part of the conspiracy, since not one of them came forward to report that some super secret group had been in their building for a couple of months planting demo charges, tearing out interior walls, stringing det cord all over the place.
We believe that all the DC Policemen and DC Firefighters who responded to the Pentagon on 9/11 were part of the conspiracy and covered up that it was not a airliner that hit the pentagon.
We believe that all the news organizations and their reporters knew about 9/11 in advance and are covering up the truth.
And why do the conspiracy theorist, always leave out that the front of WTC 7 was demolished by debris from WTC 1 & 2.
Of course they try and say, debris never touched WTC 7, but its funny how TV footage and pictures taken from behind WTC 7 before it fell, showed WTC 1 & 2 debris filling the streets on both sides of WTC 7, but were supposed to believe, that none touched WTC 7.
I have yet to see a single 9/11 conspiracy theorist come up with a plausable way that WTC 1,2 & 7 were rigged for demo, without anyone knowing about it beforehand. Actualy I have yet to see any 9/11 theorist even look at the subject of how the demo could have been planted secretly. They just say the buildings were brought down, and leave it at that, never trying to explain just how such a feat could have been accomplished.
2007-02-28 23:07:20 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know if what you are saying is the real story but I do know that the Government is not telling us the truth or at least not all of it but what else is new. BTW I don't think you are nuts for suggesting what may have happened only the closed minded reject possibility.
2007-02-28 22:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
One thing has become evident to me lately. The true nutcases and the people wearing the tinfoil hats are the ones that believe everything the government tells them and think this was just a result of some terrorists flying airplanes into buildings.
I wish I could live in such a blind ingorant bliss.
2007-02-28 22:31:46 · answer #5 · answered by nemesis_318 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
This is an excellent question, and judging from the thumbs up, and the thumbs down, it looks like we have the majority, here. You got some excellent answers. One of my favorites is Barbara L's answer. Thank you for all the great links Barbara!!!!
2007-02-28 23:40:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
So, let me get this straight. Nobody noticed that the BBC made this statement about WTC7 until after the BBC didn't announce that it lost all copies of the broadcast in which it made the statement which nobody ever noticed.
Gee, I don't know how anybody could doubt the veracity of that.
2007-02-28 22:37:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Wow, you're quoting infowars.com. What creditability does the author of this article have? I've had enough of these conspiracy people. If you're going to come up with a conspiracy at least make it some what believable.
2007-02-28 22:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
You are correct... the so called "official story" is full of holes. Alex Jones is doing good work to help inform Americans that things are not what they seem to be.
2007-02-28 22:31:28 · answer #9 · answered by Heatmizer 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I don't need to go to what is obviously a non credible website to know that 9/11 was done by Islamofascist terrorists. You can find thousands of phony sites & they are still phony.
2007-02-28 22:41:29 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋