2007-02-28 13:54:16 · 8 answers · asked by ~DiCaprio LookAlike~ 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Tatum Bell had trouble holding on to the ball and is not good at adjusting the run. He just runs where the play is going and if it is plugged he runs into it. If he does break into the open he is hard to catch.
Mike Bell needs more experience. At least he seems to adjust his running if nothing is there. He is a somewhat stronger runner then Tatum.
I think Mike Bell has more upside potential. The broncos should trade Tatum and get a player they need
2007-02-28 15:23:07 · answer #1 · answered by Wheel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Bell seems to be less injury prone but Tatum Bell is the better athlete of the two.
2007-03-01 09:28:24 · answer #2 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tatum Has more experience
but Mike was better this year
because Tatum had turnover problems
2007-02-28 22:16:15 · answer #3 · answered by GUrjinder S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tatum is a better back physically, but is oft-injured and not as hard a worker as mike, who basically competed his way into the RB rotation...if i had to pick one i would take tatum, but his injury history is definitely a concern
2007-02-28 22:17:19 · answer #4 · answered by sabes99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrell Davis, Olandis Gary, and Mike Anderson
2007-02-28 22:06:59 · answer #5 · answered by The Man in the Yellow Hat 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mike of course
2007-02-28 21:58:19 · answer #6 · answered by Mike4rmtheO 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that they both are important. now a days u need to have a good two running back attack to have succes. look at the bears and colts. they were in the super bowl and both of them split carries between two rbs throughout the year. now look at the detroit lions. they have been plagued with injurie all year and didnt have a dual rushing attack. they finished the year 3-13
2007-02-28 22:55:17 · answer #7 · answered by MItch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Taco Bell
2007-02-28 21:59:12 · answer #8 · answered by Swamyvk 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋